Analysis of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Perfusion Patterns and Time‐Intensity Curves for Metastatic Lymph Nodes from Lung Cancer: Preliminary Results

Shanshan Yin,Qiuli Cui,Song Wang,Zhihui Fan,Kun Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14345
2017-01-01
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Abstract:ObjectivesTo retrospectively summarize the similarities and differences in contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (US) findings for lymph node metastasis from adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, and small cell lung cancer.MethodsPatients who had received contrast‐enhanced US examinations and had a histologic diagnosis of supraclavicular lymph node metastasis from lung cancer were included. The perfusion patterns on contrast‐enhanced US images and time‐intensity curve parameters were analyzed for the different pathologic types. The microvascular density and microvascular diameter were evaluated.ResultsTotally, 61 patients were enrolled in this study, including 26 cases with lung squamous carcinoma, 26 with lung adenocarcinoma, and 9 with small cell lung cancer. Contrast‐enhanced US perfusion showed no significant differences in enhancement uniformity during the arterial phase and in the presence of unenhanced areas of metastatic lymph nodes with the 3 different pathologic origins (P > .05), but fewer unenhanced areas could be seen in metastatic lymph nodes from adenocarcinoma. The analysis of the time‐intensity curve parameters showed that there were significant differences in the peak intensity between metastatic lymph nodes from lung squamous carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma (P < .05). The microvascular density of metastatic lymph nodes from adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that of metastatic lymph nodes from squamous carcinoma and small cell lung cancer (P < .001; P = .0444), whereas the microvascular diameter of metastatic lymph nodes from adenocarcinoma was significantly smaller than that from squamous carcinoma and small cell lung cancer (P = .0277; P < .001).ConclusionsEffects of the pathologic diagnosis should be considered when analyzing quantitative parameters of metastatic lymph nodes during contrast‐enhanced US examinations, even in the same organ.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?