Abstract:Background Although high-throughput genotyping arrays have made whole-genome association studies (WGAS) feasible, only a small proportion of SNPs in the human genome are actually surveyed in such studies. In addition, various SNP arrays assay different sets of SNPs, which leads to challenges in comparing results and merging data for meta-analyses. Genome-wide imputation of untyped markers allows us to address these issues in a direct fashion. Methods 384 Caucasian American liver donors were genotyped using Illumina 650Y (Ilmn650Y) arrays, from which we also derived genotypes from the Ilmn317K array. On these data, we compared two imputation methods: MACH and BEAGLE. We imputed 2.5 million HapMap Release22 SNPs, and conducted GWAS on ~40,000 liver mRNA expression traits (eQTL analysis). In addition, 200 Caucasian American and 200 African American subjects were genotyped using the Affymetrix 500 K array plus a custom 164 K fill-in chip. We then imputed the HapMap SNPs and quantified the accuracy by randomly masking observed SNPs. Results MACH and BEAGLE perform similarly with respect to imputation accuracy. The Ilmn650Y results in excellent imputation performance, and it outperforms Affx500K or Ilmn317K sets. For Caucasian Americans, 90% of the HapMap SNPs were imputed at 98% accuracy. As expected, imputation of poorly tagged SNPs (untyped SNPs in weak LD with typed markers) was not as successful. It was more challenging to impute genotypes in the African American population, given (1) shorter LD blocks and (2) admixture with Caucasian populations in this population. To address issue (2), we pooled HapMap CEU and YRI data as an imputation reference set, which greatly improved overall performance. The approximate 40,000 phenotypes scored in these populations provide a path to determine empirically how the power to detect associations is affected by the imputation procedures. That is, at a fixed false discovery rate, the number of cis-eQTL discoveries detected by various methods can be interpreted as their relative statistical power in the GWAS. In this study, we find that imputation offer modest additional power (by 4%) on top of either Ilmn317K or Ilmn650Y, much less than the power gain from Ilmn317K to Ilmn650Y (13%). Conclusion Current algorithms can accurately impute genotypes for untyped markers, which enables researchers to pool data between studies conducted using different SNP sets. While genotyping itself results in a small error rate (e.g. 0.5%), imputing genotypes is surprisingly accurate. We found that dense marker sets (e.g. Ilmn650Y) outperform sparser ones (e.g. Ilmn317K) in terms of imputation yield and accuracy. We also noticed it was harder to impute genotypes for African American samples, partially due to population admixture, although using a pooled reference boosts performance. Interestingly, GWAS carried out using imputed genotypes only slightly increased power on top of assayed SNPs. The reason is likely due to adding more markers via imputation only results in modest gain in genetic coverage, but worsens the multiple testing penalties. Furthermore, cis-eQTL mapping using dense SNP set derived from imputation achieves great resolution, and locate associate peak closer to causal variants than conventional approach.

Improving Power of Association Tests Using Multiple Sets of Imputed Genotypes from Distributed Reference Panels

Impact of genotyping errors on statistical power of association tests in genomic analyses: A case study.

Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies

Genotype Imputation and Reference Panel: a Systematic Evaluation on Haplotype Size and Diversity.

Performance of Genotype Imputation for Low Frequency and Rare Variants from the 1000 Genomes

A Combined Reference Panel from the 1000 Genomes and Uk10k Projects Improved Rare Variant Imputation in European and Chinese Samples

Genotype imputation accuracy and the quality metrics of the minor ancestry in multi-ancestry reference panels

On Combining Reference Data to Improve Imputation Accuracy

Family-Based Association Tests for Genomewide Association Scans

Analyses And Comparison Of Accuracy Of Different Genotype Imputation Methods

Improved imputation of low-frequency and rare variants using the UK10K haplotype reference panel

Analyses and Comparison of Imputation-Based Association Methods

Genotype Imputation and Reference Panel: A Systematic Evaluation

Genotype-Imputation Accuracy Across Worldwide Human Populations

Comprehensive Assessment of Genotype Imputation Performance.

Regression-based Approach for Testing the Association Between Multi-Region Haplotype Configuration and Complex Trait

Genotype imputation for Han Chinese population using Haplotype Reference Consortium as reference

Association Test Between Haplotypes and Longitudinal Traits in Complex Pedigrees.

Genotype Imputation of MetabochipSNPs Using a Study‐Specific Reference Panel of ∼4,000 Haplotypes in African Americans from the Women's Health Initiative

Improving Imputation in Disease-Relevant Regions: Lessons from Cystic Fibrosis

MaCH-admix: Genotype Imputation for Admixed Populations.