Bacterial isolates from positive 'paired' venous catheter and peripheral blood cultures taken during parenteral nutrition were the same species but different strains: a case report

Peter D. Austin,Steve Green,Simon Gaisford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2024.112353
IF: 4.893
2024-01-08
Nutrition
Abstract:Introduction The same microbial species isolated from blood simultaneously drawn from a central venous catheter hub and a peripheral vein ('paired' blood cultures) during parenteral nutrition may be assumed to represent the same strain. This case report provides an example of this assumption being incorrect along with a comparator example of it being correct. This has implications for interpretation of differential time to positivity (DTP) and/or differential quantitative blood cultures (DQBC) during investigation of suspected intraluminal intravascular catheter/cannula bloodstream infection (CBI). Case description Two patients aged ≥18 years prescribed parenteral nutrition each had positive paired blood cultures that had been taken for suspected CBI because of temperature spikes ≥38°C. The paired S. epidermidis isolates from the first patient and the paired E. faecium isolates from the second patient were each tested beyond routine clinical care to establish whether or not they could be different strains. The central and peripheral isolates of S. epidermidis from the first patient were different strains based on hospital-reported antibiograms, genomic DNA profiles, thermograms, and weaker growth and different sizes of colonies of the central strain compared to the peripheral strain. There were no such differences for the isolates of E. faecium from the second patient. Conclusions This case report indicates consideration should be given to reporting whether bacteria have been identified to either species or strain level if DTP and/or DQBC is used to define CBI.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?