Microbiology of catheter associated bloodstream infection: differences according to catheter type

Aleece MacPhail,Marie-Noëlle Chraïti,Marie-Céline Zanella,Nasreen Hassoun-Kheir,Gaud Catho,Aude Nguyen,Stephan Harbarth,Niccolò Buetti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107247
IF: 12.073
2024-09-30
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Objectives Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI) cause preventable morbidity. We compared the microbiological aetiology of CABSI across different types of central and peripherally inserted catheters. Methods We analysed prospectively collected CABSI data in a 2100-bed hospital network in Switzerland between 2016 and 2022. We included: short-term non-tunnelled central venous catheters (CVC); long-term catheters (tunnelled, or peripherally inserted central catheters); arterial catheters; dialysis catheters; and peripheral venous catheters (PVC). We used multivariable logistic regression models to describe risk of Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative pathogens according to catheter type. Results 416 CABSI episodes were included, including 60 episodes of S. aureus and 92 episodes of Gram-negative CABSI. Microbiological profile differed between catheter types. Together, PVC and dialysis catheters accounted for 43/60 (72%) of all S. aureus CABSI. After adjusting for age, sex and haematology/oncology care, odds of S. aureus were higher for haemodialysis catheters (OR 17.3, 95% CI 5.75-52.2, p <0.01) and PVC (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.22-7.20, p=0.02) compared to short-term non-tunnelled CVC. Odds of Gram-negative organism as cause of CABSI were higher in long-term catheters versus short-term non-tunnelled CVC (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.37-5.24). Conclusions CABSI in catheters other than short-term non-tunnelled CVC are more commonly caused by virulent organisms including S. aureus and Gram-negative bacteria. Catheter type should be considered when selecting empirical antimicrobial therapies.
infectious diseases
What problem does this paper attempt to address?