Abstract:BackgroundChromosome conformation capture studies suggest that eukaryotic genomes are organized into structures called topologically associating domains. The borders of these domains are highly enriched for architectural proteins with characterized roles in insulator function. However, a majority of architectural protein binding sites localize within topological domains, suggesting sites associated with domain borders represent a functionally different subclass of these regulatory elements. How topologically associating domains are established and what differentiates border-associated from non-border architectural protein binding sites remain unanswered questions.ResultsBy mapping the genome-wide target sites for several Drosophila architectural proteins, including previously uncharacterized profiles for TFIIIC and SMC-containing condensin complexes, we uncover an extensive pattern of colocalization in which architectural proteins establish dense clusters at the borders of topological domains. Reporter-based enhancer-blocking insulator activity as well as endogenous domain border strength scale with the occupancy level of architectural protein binding sites, suggesting co-binding by architectural proteins underlies the functional potential of these loci. Analyses in mouse and human stem cells suggest that clustering of architectural proteins is a general feature of genome organization, and conserved architectural protein binding sites may underlie the tissue-invariant nature of topologically associating domains observed in mammals.ConclusionsWe identify a spectrum of architectural protein occupancy that scales with the topological structure of chromosomes and the regulatory potential of these elements. Whereas high occupancy architectural protein binding sites associate with robust partitioning of topologically associating domains and robust insulator function, low occupancy sites appear reserved for gene-specific regulation within topological domains.

Evolutionarily Conserved Principles Predict 3D Chromatin Organization.

Deciphering Hierarchical Chromatin Domains and Preference of Genomic Position Forming Boundaries in Single Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Structural Modeling of Chromatin Integrates Genome Features and Reveals Chromosome Folding Principle

Systematic Chromatin Architecture Analysis in Xenopus tropicalis Reveals Conserved Three-Dimensional Folding Principles of Vertebrate Genomes

Evolution and function of chromatin domains across the tree of life

Pericentromeric Heterochromatin is Hierarchically Organized and Spatially Contacts H3K9me2 Islands in Euchromatin

Organization and function of the 3D genome

Development and Evolution of Drosophila Chromatin Landscape in a 3D Genome Context

Development and Evolution of Drosophila Chromatin Landscape in a 3D Genome Context.

3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group

CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription.

Chromosome-wide simulations uncover folding pathway and 3D organization of interphase chromosomes

Predicting chromatin architecture from models of polymer physics

Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy

Mechanistic drivers of chromatin organization into compartments

Chromatin folding motifs define the basic grammar of TAD architecture in single alleles

A tour of 3D genome with a focus on CTCF

Chromatin packing domains persist after RAD21 depletion in 3D

Sub-kb Hi-C in D. Melanogaster Reveals Conserved Characteristics of TADs Between Insect and Mammalian Cells

Revisiting the Organization of Polycomb-repressed Domains: 3D Chromatin Models from Hi-C Compared with Super-Resolution Imaging

High resolution single-cell chromatin 3D modeling reveals coherent chromatin aggregation with varied structures in controlling genome function stability