Abstract:The morphology and position of pelvis are critical in regulating the biomechanical organization of spine-pelvis-leg in the sagittal plane. Several radiological parameters have been developed to present the sagittal morphology of the pelvis such as pelvic incidence (PI) and Jackson's angle (PRS1). In addition, the femoral sacral posterior angle (FSPA) was developed for patients with a dome-shaped deformity in the upper plate of the sacrum. The identification of hip axis, which was represented by the line connecting the centers of femoral heads in normal subjects, was important for these parameters measurement. However, in subjects with fused hip joint or deformed femoral heads, the accurate localization of hip axis become imprecise. Herein, the upper edge of the pubic symphysis, which is easy to identify on the lateral X-ray film, was selected as an alternative landmark of the hip axis, and two morphologic parameters, the sacrum pubic incidence (SPI) and sacrum pubic posterior angle (SPPA), were proposed accordingly. The present study aimed to understand the reliability of these two parameters and their value in predicting PI, PRS1 and FSPA.Upright standing spine and pelvis radiographs of 60 normal adults (30 male and 30 female) with an average age of 38.5 years were obtained. Two independent observers then measured the following radiological parameters on the films: PI, PRS1, FSPA, SPI, SPPA, sacral slope, pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis. The SPI is the angle between the line perpendicular to the superior plate of the first sacral vertebra at its midpoint and the line connecting this point to the upper edge of the pubic symphysis, while the SPPA is the angle between the line extending from the posterior upper edge of the sacrum to the upper edge of the pubic symphysis and the posterior side of the first sacral vertebral body. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of the parameters were analyzed using intraclass correlations. The correlations between parameters were analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Regression analysis was carried out to establish formulas to predict the values of PI, PRS1 and FSPA using the SPI and SPPA. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.The SPI was 64.4A degrees A A +/- A 9.5A degrees and 68.3A degrees A A +/- A 9.4A degrees, and the SPPA was 77.7A degrees A A +/- A 7.5A degrees and 78.7A degrees A A +/- A 9.4A degrees in males and females, respectively. These radiological parameters showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliabilities, with an intraclass correlation > 0.8. No gender differences were identified in these morphologic and positional radiological parameters. The SPI demonstrated strong correlation with PI and PRS1 (R (2) > 0.9, p < 0.001). In addition, strong correlation was also found between SPPA and FSPA (R (2) > 0.9, p < 0.001). Furthermore, both SPPA and FSPA showed close correlations with the other morphologic and positional parameters. Linear regression analysis established equations to predict PI and PRS1 using SPI and to predict FSPA by SPPA with significantly high reliability.Both SPI and SPPA are reliable parameters for determining the morphology of the pelvis. The SPI is precise in predicting PI and PRS1, while SPPA is reliable in predicting FSPA. The SPI and SPPA will allow further study on lateral spinal-pelvic alignment in patients with hip joint abnormalities.

An Analysis of Radiographic Parameters Comparison Between Lumbar Spine Latericumbent and Full-Length Lateral Standing Radiographs

The factors influencing the adjustment function of PI on spinal sagittal balance in normal subject

Comparison of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Standing Plain X-Rays and Supine MRI in Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

Correlation and Differences in Lumbopelvic Sagittal Alignment Parameters Between Lumbar Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Images

Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?

Consistency Comparison of the Parameters of the Lumbar Spine-Pelvic Sagittal Plane Between the Whole-Spine EOS Images System and Traditional X-ray

Comparison Between Supine MRI and Standing X-ray in the Measurement of Cobb Angle, Thoracic ;kyphosis and Lumbar Lordosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The change in lumbar lordosis from the standing to the lateral position: implications for lateral interbody fusion

Analysis of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment in Chinese young subjects in standing versus sitting positions

The Angle Between the Pedicle Axis of Lumbar Vertebrae and the Lateral Border of Vertebral Plate:The Measurement and Clinical Significance

Clinical Validation of the Differences Between Two-Dimensional Radiography and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Measurements of the Spine in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Comparison of Angled Versus AP View Radiography for Post-Operative Evaluation of Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: a Cadaveric Study

Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions

Artificial Intelligence X-ray Measurement Technology of Anatomical Parameters Related to Lumbosacral Stability.

The influence of different arm position on the spinal sagittal profile in normal adolescents and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

An analysis of spinopelvic sagittal alignment after lumbar lordosis reconstruction for degenerative spinal diseases: how much balance can be obtained?

Comparative Study of Preoperative Sagittal Spinal Pelvic Alignment in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Comparison of 3D and 2D Characterization of Spinal Geometry from Biplanar X-rays: a Large Cohort Study.

Radiological analysis for thoracolumbar disc herniation in spinopelvic sagittal alignment: A retrospective study.

Sacrum Pubic Incidence and Sacrum Pubic Posterior Angle: Two Morphologic Radiological Parameters in Assessing Pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Human Adults

Evaluation of the accuracy of new modalities in the assessment and classification of lumbar lordosis: A comparison to Cobb's angle measurement