Abstract:Ischaemic heart disease including heart failure is the most common cause of death in the world, and the incidence of the condition is rapidly increasing. Heart failure is characterised by symptoms such as fatigue and breathlessness during light activity, as well as disordered breathing during sleep. In particular, sleep disordered breathing (SDB), including central sleep apnoea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), is highly prevalent in people with chronic heart failure. A previous meta‐analysis demonstrated that positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy dramatically increased the survival rate of people with heart failure who had CSA, and thus could contribute to improving the prognosis of these individuals. However, recent trials found that adaptive servo‐ventilation (ASV) including PAP therapy had a higher risk of all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. A meta‐analysis that included recent trials was therefore needed. To assess the effects of positive airway pressure therapy for people with heart failure who experience central sleep apnoea. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection on 7 February 2019 with no limitations on date, language, or publication status. We also searched two clinical trials registers in July 2019 and checked the reference lists of primary studies. We excluded cross‐over trials and included individually randomised controlled trials, reported as full‐texts, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data. Two review authors independently extracted outcome data from the included studies. We double‐checked that data had been entered correctly by comparing the data presented in the systematic review with study reports. We analysed dichotomous data as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous data as mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis in the ASV group or continuous PAP group separately. We used GRADEpro GDT software to assess the quality of evidence as it relates to those studies that contribute data to the meta‐analyses for the prespecified outcomes. We included 16 randomised controlled trials involving a total of 2125 participants. The trials evaluated PAP therapy consisting of ASV or continuous PAP therapy for 1 to 31 months. Many trials included participants with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Only one trial included participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We are uncertain about the effects of PAP therapy on all‐cause mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.21; participants = 1804; studies = 6; I 2 = 47%; very low‐quality evidence). We found moderate‐quality evidence of no difference between PAP therapy and usual care on cardiac‐related mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24; participants = 1775; studies = 5; I 2 = 11%). We found low‐quality evidence of no difference between PAP therapy and usual care on all‐cause rehospitalisation (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.30; participants = 1533; studies = 5; I 2 = 40%) and cardiac‐related rehospitalisation (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.35; participants = 1533; studies = 5; I 2 = 40%). In contrast, PAP therapy showed some indication of an improvement in quality of life scores assessed by all measurements (SMD −0.32, 95% CI −0.67 to 0.04; participants = 1617; studies = 6; I 2 = 76%; low‐quality evidence) and by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MD −0.51, 95% CI −0.78 to −0.24; participants = 1458; studies = 4; I 2 = 0%; low‐quality evidence) compared with usual care. Death due to pneumonia (N = 1, 3% of PAP group); cardiac arrest (N = 18, 3% of PAP group); heart transplantation (N = 8, 1% of PAP group); cardiac worsening (N = 3, 9% of PAP group); deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (N = 1, 3% of PAP group); and foot ulcer (N = 1, 3% of PAP group) occurred in the PAP therapy group, whereas cardiac arrest (N = 16, 2% of usual care group); heart transplantation (N = 12, 2% of usual care group); cardiac worsening (N = 5, 14% of usual care group); and duodenal ulcer (N = 1, 3% of usual care group) occurred in the usual care group across three trials. The effect of PAP therapy on all‐cause mortality was uncertain. In addition, although we found evidence that PAP therapy did not reduce the risk of cardiac‐related mortality and rehospitalisation, there was some indication of an improvement in quality of life for heart failure patients with CSA. Furthermore, the evidence was insufficient to determine whether adverse events were more common with PAP than with usual care. These findings were limited by low‐ or very low‐quality evidence. PAP therapy may be worth considering for individuals with heart failure to improve quality of life. Positive airw -Abstract Truncated-

Association of Positive Airway Pressure With Cardiovascular Events and Death in Adults With Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Effect of CPAP therapy on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis

Does Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Benefit Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea? A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Does Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Benefit Patients With Coronary Artery Disease And Obstructive Sleep Apnea? A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

CPAP for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Positive Airway Pressure for Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders in Heart Failure—Overview and Discussion of Potential Mechanisms of Harm

Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure.

Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Positive Airway Pressure, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults With Sleep Apnea

Meta-analysis of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in obstructive sleep apnea with or without continuous positive airway pressure treatment

Long-term effects on clinical event, mental health, and related outcomes of CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review

Association of positive airway pressure termination with mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sleep apnea, the risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and potential benefits of continuous positive airway pressure therapy: a nationwide study

Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and CPAP Treatment on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome in the RICCADSA Trial

Effects of Positive Airway Pressure on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients with Concomitant Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Disease

Positive airway pressure therapy for post-stroke sleep disordered breathing: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Association of Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Cardiovascular Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on elderly patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis.