Clinical Application of Intense Pulsed Light Depilation Technology in Total Auricular Reconstruction

Ying Guo,Jing Shan,Tianyu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2255-1
2017-01-01
Lasers in Medical Science
Abstract:Although ear reconstruction technology has been highly developed in recent years, hair growth on the reconstructed ear has plagued both surgeons and patients. In this paper, the authors introduce a clinical application of intense pulsed light depilation in total auricular reconstruction. From August 2012 to August 2013, 27 patients (28 ears) suffering from congenital microtia were treated by intense pulsed light depilation (650–950-nm filter, initial fluence of 14–16 J/cm2 and gradually increased, pulse width of 30–50 ms, spot size of 20 × 30 mm2, intervals of 6–8 weeks, a total of four sessions) either before or after auricular reconstruction. According to the treatment situation at diagnosis, the patients were divided into two groups: the preoperative group and the postoperative group. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age or initial fluence for hair removal; however, there were less treatments in the former than in the latter group (preoperative group 4.1 ± 0.3, postoperative group 4.7 ± 0.7, F = 9.10, P = 0.006), and the maximum fluence used for hair removal was lower in the former than in the latter group (preoperative group 18–20 J/cm2, postoperative group 19–22 J/cm2, F = 22.31, P < 0.001). After follow-up for ≥4–6 months, the effective rate was 100% in the preoperative group, and the effective rate was 80% in the postoperative group. Intense pulsed light depilation technology is a reasonable complementary approach to total auricular reconstruction. And preoperative depilation is recommended over postoperative depilation. The non-invasive modern photonic technology can resolve the problem of postoperative residual hair on the reconstructed auricle, improving auricular shape and increasing patient satisfaction. In addition, an adequately set preoperative hair removal area can provide surface skin that is most similar to normal auricle skin for auricular reconstruction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?