Abstract:In this conceptual contribution, we argue that experimental investigations of phenomena in the cognitive sciences and consciousness research may benefit from a thorough integration of data acquired from the first-person perspective. We present a line of research from our lab applying this approach to the Libet task on voluntary action. In this well-known experimental paradigm, participants perform a movement at a moment of their own choice. Previous research has shown that this voluntary decision to perform the action is preceded by a specific pattern in the electroencephalogram, the so-called readiness potential. This finding that the decision is preceded (and presumably determined) by an action-related brain processes puts the neuroscientific account at odds with our subjective intuition and challenges the notion of free will. This discrepancy exemplifies the gap between neuro-cognitive models of the mind and the accounts of our conscious experience. The aim of our theoretical proposal is to enrich the study of volitional action by integrating reports from the first-person perspective with the Libet paradigm to develop a more coherent account. This provides an example of implementing the research program of neurophenomenology developed by Francisco Varela to overcome the gap between scientific accounts of the mind and subjective experience. Specifically, we show how this can be achieved by interweaving three methodological approaches: (i) adapting common neuro-cognitive paradigms (i.e., the Libet task); (ii) employing refined first-person methods such as the micro-phenomenological interview; and (iii) collaborating with experienced meditators as research participants. Our contribution demonstrates how the neurophenomenological framework can be used to shed new light on long-standing and fundamental debates in consciousness research. We show that this approach not only addresses questions of intellectual curiosity but also has concrete ethical implications for the practice of science itself, self-determination, and the accountability of the conscious subject. On the basis of our approach, meditation can be seen as a method for enhancing self-regulation and self-determination, which allows for more deliberate decisions and thus more ethical behavior.

The readiness potential and the soul: what happens when you resect their seat in the brain?

On Libet’s Theory of Conscious Mental Field

Consciousness and neurosurgery

"Your Thoughts are (were) Free!": Brain-Computer-Interfaces, Neurofeedback, Detection of Deception, and the Future of Mind-Reading

The Self and Its Resting State in Consciousness: an Investigation of the Vegetative State.

Free will without consciousness?

Partial awareness during voluntary endogenous decision

Probing for Intentions: The Early Readiness Potential Does Not Reflect Awareness of Motor Preparation

Critical Psychology and the Brain: Rethinking Free will in the Legal Context

A novel cognitive neurosurgery approach for supramaximal resection of non-dominant precuneal gliomas: a case report

Functional connectivity of sensorimotor network before and after surgery in the supplementary motor area

An evidence-based critical review of the mind-brain identity theory

What is the Intention to Move and When Does it Occur?

Residual Cognitive Capacities in Patients With Cognitive Motor Dissociation, and Their Implications for Well-Being

Split brain: divided perception but undivided consciousness

Free Will and Advances in Cognitive Science

Advances in brain and religion studies: a review and synthesis of recent representative studies

Neurophenomenology in Action: Integrating the First-Person Perspective into the Libet Experiment

The disconnection syndrome. Basic findings reaffirmed

Using a Veto paradigm to investigate the decision models in explaining Libet-style experiments

Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value