Abstract:Objective. Motor-related brain-computer interface (BCI) have a broad range of applications, with the detection of premovement intentions being a prominent use case. However, the electroencephalography (EEG) features during the premovement phase are not distinctly evident and are susceptible to attentional influences. These limitations impede the enhancement of performance in motor-based BCI. The objective of this study is to establish a premovement BCI encoding paradigm that integrates the preparatory movement state and validates its feasibility in improving the detection of movement intentions. Methods. Two button tasks were designed to induce subjects into a preparation state for two movement intentions (left and right) based on visual guidance, in contrast to spontaneous premovement. The low frequency movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and high frequency event-related desynchronization (ERD) EEG data of 14 subjects were recorded. Extracted features were fused and classified using task‐related common spatial patterns (TR-CSP) and common spatial patterns (CSP) algorithms. Differences between prepared premovement and spontaneous premovement were compared in terms of time domain, frequency domain, and classification accuracy. Results. In the time domain, MRCPs features reveal that prepared premovement induce lower amplitude and earlier latency on both contralateral and ipsilateral motor cortex compared to spontaneous premovement, with susceptibility to the dominant hand's influence. Frequency domain ERD features indicate that prepared premovement induce lower ERD values bilaterally, and the ERD recovery speed after button press is the fastest. By using the fusion approach, the classification accuracy increased from 78.92% for spontaneous premovement to 83.59% for prepared premovement (p<0.05). Along with the 4.67% improvement in classification accuracy, the standard deviation decreased by 0.95. Significance. The research findings confirm that incorporating a preparatory state into premovement enhances neural representations related to movement. This encoding enhancement paradigm effectively improves the performance of motor-based BCI. Additionally, this concept has the potential to broaden the range of decodable movement intentions and related information in motor-related BCI.

What is the Intention to Move and When Does it Occur?

Intention regulates conflicting desires in human decision making

On Libet’s Theory of Conscious Mental Field

Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components

An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement

Origins of Intentionality: Identity, Self-creativity and Meaning

Probing for Intentions: The Early Readiness Potential Does Not Reflect Awareness of Motor Preparation

Motor Intentions Decoded from fMRI Signals

Intention Beyond Desire: Spontaneous Intentional Commitment Regulates Conflicting Desires.

Conscious Intention-Based Processes Impact the Neural Activities Prior to Voluntary Action on Reinforcement Learning Schedules

Does the movement matter? Determinants of the latency of temporally urgent motor reactions

Intention Beyond Desire: Humans Spontaneously Commit to Future Actions.

Cues to intention: the role of movement information

Motor decision-making under uncertainty and time pressure

Happiness in action: the impact of positive affect on the time of the conscious intention to act

Intention Beyond Desire: Commitment in Human Action

Decoding intentions from movement kinematics

Partial awareness during voluntary endogenous decision

Neural dynamics of the intention to speak

Pupil dilations prior to freely timed actions reflect the reported timing of conscious intention

Preparatory movement state enhances premovement EEG representations for brain-computer interfaces