Hydrogen-Bonded Biohybrid Framework-Derived Highly Specific Nanozymes for Biomarker Sensing

Niru Ye,Siming Huang,Huangsheng Yang,Tong Wu,Linjing Tong,Fang Zhu,Guosheng Chen,Gangfeng Ouyang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03381
IF: 7.4
2021-10-04
Analytical Chemistry
Abstract:Nanozymes are of particular interest due to their enzyme-mimicking activity and high stability that are favorable in biomedical sensing and immunoassays. In this work, we report a highly specific N-doped nanozyme through pyrolysis of framework-confined bovine serum albumin (BSA). This strategy allows one to translate the low-cost and featureless BSA into a highly active enzyme mimic. The obtained carbon nanozyme (denoted as HBF-1-C800) displays 3- to 7-fold enhancement on peroxidase (POD) activity compared with the conventional carbon nanozymes and also shows ca. 5-fold activity enhancement compared to the reported N-doping graphene. Such excellent POD activity originates from high N-doping efficiency, protein-induced defective sites, and the intrinsic porous structure of HBF-1-C800, which provides abundantly accessible active sites and accelerates substrate diffusion simultaneously. Importantly, the HBF-1-C800 nanozyme has highly specific POD activity and also enables resistance to several harsh conditions that should denature natural enzymes. These features allow it with high accuracy, stability, and sensitivity for biosensing applications. Moreover, HBF-1-C800 has been designed as a promising platform for colorimetric biosensing of several biomarkers including H2O2, glutathione, and glucose, with wide linear ranges and low limits of detection that are satisfied with the disease diagnosis.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03381.Supplementary experimental section; Figure S1: SEM images of PFC-1 and HBF-1; Figure S2: TGA curves of PFC-1 and HBF-1; Figure S3: nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and corresponding Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas of PFC-1, HBF-1, PFC-1-C800, and HBF-1-C800; Figure S4: POD-like activities of HBF-1 after pyrolysis in different temperatures; Figure S5: SEM images of PFC-1-C800 and HBF-1-C800; Figure S6: TEM image of PFC-1-C800; Figure S7: Raman spectra of PFC-1 and PFC-1-C800; Figure S8: XPS survey spectra of PFC-1-C800 and HBF-1-C800 and high-resolution C 1s spectra of HBF-1-C800; Figure S9: POD-like activity of HBF-1-C800 and natural HRP; Figure S10: SOD-like, laccase-like, oxidase-like, and CAT-like activities of the HBF-1-C800 nanozyme; Figure S11: catalytic kinetic curves of HBF-1-C800 and PFC-1-C800 toward the oxidation of TMB under different amounts of H2O2 and steady-state kinetic curves of HBF-1-C800 and PFC-1-C800 toward H2O2; Figure S12: steady-state kinetic curves of graphene and N-doped graphene toward H2O2; Figure S13: POD-mimic activity of HBF-1-C800 after storage at room temperature for 3 months; Figure S14: selectivity analysis of H2O2, GSH, and glucose sensing; Figure S15: UV–Vis spectra of the Bradford protein assay; Table S1: elemental analysis of PFC-1, PFC-1-C800, HBF-1, and HBF-1-C800; Table S2: nitrogen content of HBF-1-C800 and other carbon catalysts; Table S3: comparison of the kinetic parameters of HBF-1-C800 and other reported carbon nanozymes; Table S4: comparison of the biosensing performances of HBF-1-C800 and other reported nanozymes (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?