Abstract:Background Detection of EGFR mutations in tumour tissue is the gold-standard approach to ascertain if a patient will benefit from treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, if tissue is scant, another strategy is to use circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), but this method needs validation in clinical trials. We did a prospective clinical trial to assess ctDNA-based EGFR mutation detection as a selection criterion for patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib as first-line treatment. Methods BENEFIT is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial at 15 centres in China. Patients aged 18-75 years with stage IV metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations detected in ctDNA were given oral gefitinib 250 mg once daily as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion achieving an objective response. Secondary endpoints included median progression-free survival and safety. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a 168-gene panel was used for genetic analysis of baseline blood samples. The primary efficacy analysis was done by intention to treat in patients who had at least one post-baseline tumour assessment. The safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov,numberNCT02282267. Findings Between Dec 25, 2014, and Jan 16, 2016, 426 patients were screened for the trial, of whom 188 with EGFR mutations in ctDNA were enrolled and received gefitinib. 183 patients had one or more post-baseline tumour assessment and were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Median follow-up was 14.5 months (IQR 12.2-16.5). At the time of data cutoff (Jan 31, 2017), 152 patients had progressive disease or had died. The proportion achieving an objective response was 72.1% (95% CI 65.0-78.5). Median progression-free survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 9.07-11.04). Of 167 patients with available blood samples, 147 (88%) showed clearance of EGFR mutations in ctDNA at week 8, and median progression-free survival was longer for these patients than for the 20 patients whose EGFR mutations persisted at week 8 (11.0 months [95% CI 9.43-12.85] vs 2.1 months [1.81-3.65]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.23; p<0.0001). From baseline NGS data in 179 patients, we identified three subgroups of patients: those with EGFR mutations only (n=58), those with mutations in EGFR and tumour-suppressor genes (n=97), and those with mutations in EGFR and oncogenes (n=24). Corresponding median progression-free survival in these subgroups was 13.2 months (95% CI 11.5-15.0), 9.3 months (7.6-11.0), and 4.7 months (1.9-9.3), respectively (EGFR mutations only vs mutations in EGFR and tumour-suppressor genes, HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.23-2.58; p=0.002; EGFR mutations only vs mutations in EGFR and oncogenes, 2.66, 1.58-4.49; p=0.0003). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hepatic function abnormalities (n=24). Serious adverse events were reported in 17 (9%) patients. No unexpected safety events for gefitinib were recorded. Interpretation Detection of EGFR mutations in ctDNA is an effective method to identify patients who might benefit from first-line gefitinib treatment. Further analyses of dynamic alterations of EGFR mutations and accompanying gene aberrances could predict resistance to gefitinib. Copyright (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

A phase III randomised controlled trial of erlotinib vs gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations

Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Egfr-Mutation- Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Progression on First-Line Gefitinib (impress): A Phase 3 Randomised Trial

Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised, Phase 3 Study

Fruquintinib with Gefitinib As First-Line Therapy in Patients Carrying EGFR Mutations with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Single-Arm, Phase II Study

Phase II trial of gefitinib in pretreated Chinese women with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 EGFR -mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: final overall survival analysis of the EMERGING-CTONG 1103 randomised phase II trial

Erlotinib Versus Etoposide/Cisplatin with Radiation Therapy in Unresectable Stage III Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial

1370Tip Befotertinib Versus Icotinib As First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Phase III Study

Icotinib Versus Chemotherapy As Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II–IIIA EGFR-mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (EVIDENCE): a Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin As Neoadjuvant Treatment Of Stage Iiia-N2 Egfr-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (Emerging-Ctong 1103): A Randomized Phase Ii Study

A randomized phase 2 trial of erlotinib versus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced EGFR wild-type and EGFR FISH-positive lung adenocarcinoma.

Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin As Adjuvant Therapy in Chinese Patients with Stage IIIA EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (EVAN): a Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial.

Final Overall Survival Results from a Randomised, Phase III Study of Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802).

CTONG1103: Final overall survival analysis of the randomized phase 2 trial of erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.

Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma Circulating Tumour DNA As a Selection Criterion for First-Line Gefitinib Treatment in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma (BENEFIT): a Phase 2, Single-Arm, Multicentre Clinical Trial

Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIIA-N2 <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (EMERGING-CTONG 1103): A Randomized Phase II Study

Efficacy and Tolerability of Erlotinib 100 mg/d vs. Gefitinib 250 mg/d in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (E100VG250): An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study

Afatinib Versus Gefitinib As First-Line Treatment of Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (Lux-Lung 7): a Phase 2B, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled trial of chemotherapy plus geiftinib as ifrst-line treatment for patients with advancedEGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma

Gefitinib (an EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor) Plus Anlotinib (an Multikinase Inhibitor) for Untreated, EGFR-mutated, Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (FL-ALTER): a Multicenter Phase III Trial.

Clinical outcomes and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation among first‐line gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib‐treated non‐small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations