Efficacy and Tolerability of Erlotinib 100 mg/d vs. Gefitinib 250 mg/d in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (E100VG250): An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study

Shen Zhao,Zhen Zhang,Wenfeng Fang,Yaxiong Zhang,Zhonghan Zhang,Shaodong Hong,Yuxiang Ma,Ting Zhou,Yunpeng Yang,Yan Huang,Hongyun Zhao,Li Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.587849
IF: 4.7
2020-11-10
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:<span><strong>Background:</strong> Erlotinib-based combination therapy leads to increased efficacy but also toxicity for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Reducing the dose of erlotinib could improve treatment tolerability, but few evidences are available regarding its efficacy at reduced dose. This randomized phase-2 study intends to compare the efficacy and tolerability between lower dose erlotinib (100 mg/d) and standard dose gefitinib (250 mg/d) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.<strong>Methods:</strong> Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized at 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 100 mg/d or gefitinib 250 mg/d until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR).<strong>Results:</strong> Between April 2013 and September 2018, 171 patients were randomized to receive erlotinib (<i>n</i> = 85) and gefitinib (<i>n</i> = 86); 74 in the erlotinib group and 83 in the gefitinib group were include in analysis. DCR with erlotinib and gefitinib were 91% [95% CI 81.7–95.3] and 93% [85.1–96.6], respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.613). Response rate was 62% [50.8–72.4] in the erlotinib group and 53% [42.4–63.4] in the gefitinib group (<i>P</i> = 0.247). No significant difference was observed between erlotinib and gefitinib in median progression-free survival [10.1 vs. 11.3 months, HR = 1.295 [0.893–1.879], <i>P</i> = 0.171] and median overall survival [26.6 vs. 28.7 months, HR = 0.999 [0.637–1.569], <i>P</i> = 0.998]. Subgroup analyses by line of treatment, EGFR subtypes and status of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis found similar results. More toxicity [any-grade, 80 [96%] vs. 66 [89]; grade 3–4, 11 [13%] vs. 4 [5%]] and toxicity-related discontinuation [10 [12%] vs. 3 [4%]] occurred with gefitinib compared with erlotinib. But no significant difference was observed.<strong>Conclusion:</strong> Lower dose erlotinib (100 mg/d) achieved comparable efficacy compared with standard dose gefitinib (250 mg/d) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.<strong>Clinical Trial Registration:</strong> <a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov">https://clinicaltrials.gov</a>, identifier: NCT01955421.</span>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?