Comparison of Different Rate-Responsive Pacing Algorithms Based on Intracardiac Impedance

Huakui Yang,Xiang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/cisp-bmei.2016.7852974
2016-01-01
Abstract:Closed-loop stimulation (CLS), based on intracardiac impedance, is a method of rate-responsive pacing. There are many CLS algorithms propounded in previous researches, such as stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), half cycle activity (HCA) and ventricular inotropic parameter (VIP). To compare these algorithms' performance this study measured 3 male beagles' intracardiac impedance waveform during different exercise levels, and then impedance data were processed with different algorithms. It demonstrated that all algorithms have good linear correlation with exercise levels (r(2) in complete atrioventricular block, SV: 0.75310, EF: 0.74056, HCA: 0.75014, and VIP: 0.81278; r(2) in normal heart, SV: 0.70748, EF: 0.72637, HCA: 0.80509, VIP: 0.83660. in all case, p < 0.0001) and there was no clear difference among all algorithms. Compared with SV, EF has not behaved expected superiority because only exercise level was taken into account. HCA, based on whole impedance waveform, was slightly better than SV. VIP has an excellent linear correlation with exercise level even calculated by a rough way. These results also demonstrated that all algorithms can accurately reflect the changes of myocardial contractility during exercise.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?