Comparative Study on Atrial Fibrillation Mechanism of Different Pacing Model

CHEN Lin,LIN Ya-zhou,CHEN Zhi-qun,XU Chun-xuan,DENG Yu-lian,CHEN Bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4194.2005.04.018
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To comparative study the electrical and structrual remodeling of atrial fibrillation(AF) induced by atrial tachypacing(ATP) and ventricular tachypacing(VTP) model,to discuss the mechanism of AF induced by different pacing model especially congestive heart failure(CHF) induced by VTP.Methods 21 mongrel dogs were used and randomized into control,ATP and VTP group.Burst atrial pacing was used to induce AF.Atrial effective refractory period(ERP) was measured by S_1S_2. Atrial systosic ending area was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Tissue samples were stained with Mallory trichrome and analyzed with Sigma Scan 4.0.Results Compared with control group,LVEF decreased in VTP group.AF and sustained AF rate increased and duration of AF(DAF) prolonged significantly in both pacing group;ATP strongly decreased the effective refractory period(ERP) and abolished ERP rate adaptation(ERP-RA) at various basic cycle lengthes(BCL),and DAF has a positive correlation with ERP.ERP and ERP-RA had no change in VTP group.Atrial fibrous tissue content and atrial size of VTP group were significantly greater than those of the controls and ATP dogs.And DAF has a positive correlation with LA systolic area and LA fibrosis by VTP-induced CHF.Conclusion Electrical remodeling induced by atrial tachypacing,including shortening of atrial ERP and attenuating of ERP-RA,may mostly be responsible for incidence and sustaining of AF.Atrial structural remodeling such as dilation and fibrosis though VTP-induced CHF creates a substrate that be very different from ATP model for AF.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?