Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects on performance of two types of misfits (overfit vs underfit) as well as two types of fits (high-high fit vs low-low fit) between environmental uncertainty and supply chain flexibility.Design/methodology/approach - The two asymmetry hypotheses have been tested with survey data from 212 Chinese manufacturing firms.Findings - The results in general provided empirical evidences for the asymmetric effects in the fits and misfits between environmental uncertainty and supply chain flexibility. For the same degree of misfit, underfit deteriorates performance more than overfit. In addition, high supply chain flexibility fitting high environmental uncertainty (i.e. high-high fit) results in a higher performance than low supply chain flexibility fitting low environmental uncertainty (i.e. low-low fit).Practical implications - It suggests that managers should strive to avoid the underfit of supply chain flexibility rather than the overfit, if the perfect fit is impossible to achieve. In addition, as it is beneficial to realize the fit of supply chain flexibility to high levels of environmental uncertainty, managers should probably embrace the highly uncertain environment and enhance the supply chain flexibility of their organizations to meet the increasing uncertainty of environment.Originality/value - Fit and misfit are the core concepts to understand the relationships among environmental uncertainty, supply chain flexibility strategy, and performance. While the existing literature highlights the differential performance consequences of fit vs misfit between environmental uncertainty and supply chain flexibility strategy, the effects on performance are assumed to be the same for the two types of misfits, and two types of fits. The authors challenge these symmetry assumptions by arguing that overfit has a less negative effect on performance than underfit, and high-high fit has a stronger positive effect than low-low fit. The authors found empirical evidence in a large sample of Chinese manufacturing firms.

The Fit between External Involvement and Business Environment: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms.

The Fit Between External Involvement and Business Environment

External involvement and operational performance: The mediating role of internal integration

Impact of External Involvement in the New Product Development Process on Firm Performance

Antecedents and Performance Consequences of External Involvement in New Product Development

The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: Evidence from China

How Environmental Orientation Influences Firm Performance: the Missing Link of Green Supply Chain Integration

The fit between supply chain internal and external integration

Inter-organizational Fit and Environmental Innovation in Supply Chains: A Configuration Approach

An investigation of strategic configurations and their impacts on performance of Chinese manufacturing companies

The Fit Between Environmental Management Systems And Organisational Learning Orientation

An Empirical Test of the Information Processing Theory

Strategic Fit: an Empirical Test from Chinese Firms

A reductionistic or holistic approach? The impacts of fit patterns of supplier and customer integration on company and supply chain performance

Asymmetrical Effects in Both Fits and Misfits between Environment and Strategy

Institutional force and firm performance: Do employee green involvement and flexibility‐oriented culture matter?

The Influence of Green External Integration on Firm Performance: Does Firm Size Matter?

External Involvement and Green Product Innovation: the Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty

Does IT Matter for Environmental Performance? an Empirical Study Based on the Chinese Context

External Involvement and Firm Performance: is Time-to-market of New Products a Missing Link?

Fits and Misfits of Supply Chain Flexibility to Environmental Uncertainty Two Types of Asymmetric Effects on Performance