Development of a Mechanically Flexible 2D-MXene Membrane Cathode for Selective Electrochemical Reduction of Nitrate to N 2 : Mechanisms and Implications

Yang Li,Jinxing Ma,T. David Waite,Michael R. Hoffmann,Zhiwei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00264

2021-06-16

Abstract:The contamination of water resources by nitrate is a major problem. Herein, we report a mechanically flexible 2D-MXene (Ti₃C₂T<i>_x</i>) membrane with multilayered nanofluidic channels for a selective electrochemical reduction of nitrate to nitrogen gas (N₂). At a low applied potential of −0.8 V (vs Ag/AgCl), the MXene electrochemical membrane was found to exhibit high selectivity for NO₃^– reduction to N₂ (82.8%) due to a relatively low desorption energy barrier for the release of adsorbed N₂ (*N₂) compared to that for the adsorbed NH₃ (*NH₃) based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Long-term use of the MXene membrane for treating 10 mg-NO₃-N L^–1 in water was found to have a high faradic efficiency of 72.6% for NO₃^– reduction to N₂ at a very low electrical cost of 0.28 kWh m^–3. Results of theoretical calculations and experimental results showed that defects on the MXene nanosheet surfaces played an important role in achieving high activity, primarily at the low-coordinated Ti sites. Water flowing through the MXene nanosheets facilitated the mass transfer of nitrate onto the low-coordinated Ti sites with this enhancement of particular importance under cathodic polarization of the MXene membrane. This study provides insight into the tailoring of nanoengineered materials for practical application in water treatment and environmental remediation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c00264?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c00264</a>.Additional materials and methods (Sections S1–S6); diffusion behavior of nitrate in the cathode (Figure S1); AFM images of MXene nanosheets and ANF (Figure S2); TEM images of MXene nanosheets (Figure S3); plots of displacement vs load of MXene membrane (Figure S4); Doppler broadening W parameter (Figure S5); Doppler broadening W–S parameters (Figure S6); schematic illustration of the H-shaped electrochemical reaction cell (Figure S7); effects of potential on pollutant removal (Figure S8); kinetics of the electrochemical NO₃^– reduction (Figure S9); areal capacitance of the MXene membrane (Figure S10); products of nitrate reduction under different concentrations of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ (Figure S11); detection of electrochemically active surface area (Figure S12); potential of zero charge for MXene membrane (Figure S13); removal efficiency of NaNO₃, KNO₃, and Ca(NO₃)₂ (Figure S14); photograph of the continuous-flow reactor with notations (Figure S15); proposed reaction pathway of nitrate electrochemical reduction on the defect-free MXene sites (Figure S16); SEM images of the cross section of the MXene membrane (Figure S17); XPS of MXene membrane before and after electrochemical nitrate reduction (Figure S18); O 1s spectra of the as-prepared MXene membrane (Figure S19); ζ-potential measurements (Figure S20); water contact angles measurements (Figure S21); LSVs recorded in 10 mM Na₂SO₄ and 10 mM NaNO₃ (Figure S22); peak heights on square root of scan rate measured by LSV (Figure S23); EIS Nyquist plots of the MXene cathodes (Figure S24); chronoamperometry experiments of MXene membrane at different potentials (vs Ag/AgCl) (Figure S25); electrochemical reduction of low-concentration nitrate under the flow-through filtration (Figure S26); cyclic voltammograms and calculated diffusion coefficient of nitrate (Figure S27); leaching of Ti of MXene membrane during nitrate removal (Figure S28); XRD patterns of the MXene membrane before and after nitrate removal (Figure S29); calculated transition barrier energy profiles (Figure S30); SAXS profiles of the MXene membrane (Figure S31); calculated free energy of the proposed reaction pathways (Figure S32); deformation charge density of *NO₃ (Figure S33); calculated adsorption energies of HER process (Figure S34); calculated adsorption energies of H₂ on the MXene (Figure S35); effects of ORR process on pollutant removal (Figure S36); poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) rejection by the MXene membrane (Table S1); nitrate rejection of the MXene membrane (Table S2); concentration of free chlorine at different applied potentials (Table S3); comparison of the 2D-MXene electrochemical NO₃^– reduction performance to literature (Table S4); yield rate and faradic efficiencies (FEs) for H₂ in the electrochemical nitrate reduction (Table S5); and yield rate and faradic efficiencies (FE) for H₂ in the Na₂SO₄ solution at different potentials (Table S6) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.1c00264/suppl_file/es1c002 <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental