Abstract:Feedback enables individuals to learn new routines. The current study suggested that individuals paid more attention on rule‐related information that conveyed by feedback during rule learning. However, the role of valence on feedback were significantly weakened. Specifically, the processing of rule‐related information of feedback relied on a broad brain oscillatory activity (i.e. delta‐theta and alpha‐beta bands) within frontoparietal cortex to facilitate rule information integration. Information conveyed through feedback enables individuals to learn new routines and better adapt to their environment. However, the neural mechanisms of rule‐related information of feedback have not been fully elucidated. Herein, we quantified the effect of informative value on feedback via a rule induction task (RIT), in which participants were required to find the correct sorting rule based on feedback. To disengage the effects of informative value and valence on feedback in the RIT, a control task was developed in which feedback only involved the valence aspect and no reference for subsequent selections. We measured power and intertrial phase clustering (ITPC) values via EEG to determine the neural mechanisms of rule‐related feedback. The results revealed that (1) differences in oscillatory activities between positive and negative feedback were only observed during the control task, and no such effect was found in the RIT task. This finding suggests that the participants paid more attention to rule‐related information than to the correctness of feedback during rule learning. (2) The task differences under positive or negative feedback were associated with the delta‐theta and alpha‐beta bands, and this pattern was similar within the frontal and parietal regions. These findings suggest that the processing of rule‐related information of feedback relies on broad frequency bands within the frontoparietal cortex to facilitate rule information integration. In summary, these findings indicate that multiple frequency bands are involved in encoding the informative value aspect of feedback, and individuals rely on this aspect of feedback rather than valence during rule learning.

Oscillatory Profiles Of Positive, Negative And Neutral Feedback Stimuli During Adaptive Decision Making

Beta-gamma Oscillation Reveals Learning from Unexpected Reward in Learners Versus Non-Learners

The role of brain oscillatory activity in processing the informative value of feedback during rule acquisition

Electrophysiological measures reveal the role of anterior cingulate cortex in learning from unreliable feedback

Frontal Theta Oscillatory Activity Is a Common Mechanism for the Computation of Unexpected Outcomes and Learning Rate

On the Utility of Positive and Negative Feedback in a Paired-associate Learning Task

Emotional State and Feedback-Related Negativity Induced by Positive, Negative, and Combined Reinforcement.

Neural Activities Underlying the Feedback Express Salience Prediction Errors for Appetitive and Aversive Stimuli

Common and distinct electrophysiological correlates of feedback processing during risky and ambiguous decision making

No reward could be similar to penalty: Evidence from feedback negativity and P300

Decision-Feedback Stages Revealed by Hidden Markov Modeling of EEG.

Feedback-related Brain Activity in Individual Decision: Evidence from a Gambling EEG Study.

Brain Activity Elicited by Positive and Negative Feedback in Preschool-Aged Children

This Ought to Be Good: Brain Activity Accompanying Positive and Negative Expectations and Outcomes.

Brain Responses in Evaluating Feedback Stimuli with a Social Dimension.

Brain potentials associated with outcome expectation and outcome evaluation.

Simulated operant reflex conditioning environment reveals effects of feedback parameters

To Know or Not to Know? Theta and Delta Reflect Complementary Information about an Advanced Cue Before Feedback in Decision-Making

Valence and Magnitude Ambiguity in Feedback Processing

Electrophysiological correlates of prediction formation in anticipation of reward‐ and punishment‐related feedback signals

Prediction-error-dependent processing of immediate and delayed positive feedback