Abstract:Background: Liver surgery has traditionally been characterized by the complexity of its procedures and potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality in inexperienced hands. The robotic approach has gradually been introduced in liver surgery and has increased notably in recent years. However, few centers currently perform robotic liver surgery and experiences in robot-assisted surgical procedures continue to be limited compared to the laparoscopic approach. Aim: To analyze the outcomes and feasibility of an initial robotic liver program implemented in an experienced laparoscopic hepatobiliary center. Methods: A total of forty consecutive patients underwent robotic liver resection (da Vinci Xi, intuitive.com, United States) between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients were prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Results: The mean age of patients was 59.55 years, of which 18 (45%) were female. The mean body mass index was 29.41 kg/m². Nine patients (22.5%) were cirrhotic. Patients were divided by type of resection as follows: Ten segmentectomies, three wedge resections, ten left lateral sectionectomies, six bisegmentectomies (two V-VI bisegmentectomies and four IVb-V bisegmentectomies), two right anterior sectionectomies, five left hepatectomies and two right hepatectomies. Malignant lesions occurred in twenty-nine (72.5%) of the patients. The mean operative time was 258.11 min and two patients were transfused intraoperatively (5%). Inflow occlusion was used in thirty cases (75%) and the mean total clamping time was 32.62 min. There was a single conversion due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > IIIb) occurred in three patients (7.5%) and mortality in one (2.5%). No patient required readmission to the hospital. The mean hospital stay was 5.6 d. Conclusion: Although robotic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with favorable short-term outcomes, it involves a demanding learning curve that requires a high level of training, skill and dexterity.

Experience-based transition to robotic surgery in an experienced program in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: from Laparoscopic Surgery to Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System

Single-Institution Early Experience and Learning Curve with Robotic Liver Resections

Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience

Implementing a robotic hepatopancreatobiliary program for new faculty: safety, feasibility and lessons learned

Robotic liver surgery: preliminary experience in a tertiary hepato-biliary unit

Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery

State of the Art in Robotic Hepatobiliary Surgery

Initial experience with a robotic hepatectomy program at a high-volume laparoscopic center: single-center experience and surgical tips

Early experiences in robotic single‐site plus one port platform for complex hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

Safe implementation of minimally invasive surgery in a specialized colorectal cancer unit

Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections

Robotic approach to the liver: Open surgery in a closed abdomen or laparoscopic surgery with technical constraints?

Implementing a robotic liver resection program does not always require prior laparoscopic experience

Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors

Adapting to a Robotic Era: The Transferability of Open and Laparoscopic Skills to Robotic Surgery

Institutional First 100 Case Experience and Outcomes of Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors

What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?

Robotic vs. laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma