Abstract:Over the past two decades, minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has progressively become the standard for minor resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In contrast, its implementation in major hepatectomy has been slower due to its higher technical complexity and morbidity. However, studies published in recent years have demonstrated that minimally invasive major hepatectomy (MIMH) is safe and feasible with less blood loss, fewer complications, earlier recovery, decreased hospital stay, and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with open surgery. This review examines the current status of MIMH, focusing on the respective strengths and weaknesses of the laparoscopic and robotic approaches, as well as assessing their cost-effectiveness and possible future directions. The earlier introduction of laparoscopic liver resection has led to its widespread utilization as a safe and accurate alternative to open hepatectomy. Of note is that the robotic approach has also been increasingly utilized, demonstrating better perioperative outcomes and decreased need for conversion to open hepatectomy vs. the laparoscopic approach. Advantages associated with the robotic approach include the three-dimensional large visual field and instrumental flexibility, allowing for improved bleeding control. Even though evidence has been slowly accumulating regarding long-term outcomes, most studies report no notable differences between open, robotic, and laparoscopic resection for HCC. Regarding cost-effectiveness, MIMH has been characterized by higher operating room and anesthesia costs, especially for robotic procedures that require highly expensive equipment. The increase in cost is often offset by the lower morbidity and, thus, shorter hospital stays associated with MIMH. Future developments, such as the implementation of artificial intelligence and augmented reality, may potentially maximize the safety and applicability of MIMH and, in time, lead to improved postoperative and oncological outcomes.

Robotic vs. laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Positioning of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Laparoscopic to Robot-Assisted Liver Resection

Minimally invasive surgery approaches in major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Robotic vs laparoscopic hemihepatectomy: A comparative study from a single center.

Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Primary Hepatobiliary Tumors—Possibilities and Limitations

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience of 629 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Liver Resections

Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures

Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma:a comparison of short term outcomes

What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?

Robotic Radical Surgery for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Centre Case Series.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center

Current status and future perspectives of robotic liver surgery

A Contemporary Review of Robotic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Robotic Minor hepatectomy offers a Favorable Learning Curve and May Result in Superior Perioperative Outcomes Compared with Laparoscopic Approach

Robotic liver surgery: preliminary experience in a tertiary hepato-biliary unit

Robotic approach to the liver: Open surgery in a closed abdomen or laparoscopic surgery with technical constraints?

A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms

Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review