Abstract:Introduction: The guideline development process should be precise and rigorous to ensure that the results are reproducible and not vague. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play an important role in healthcare system. To determine the quality of guidelines the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation (AGREEII) instrument was developed and introduced. Methods: Eight databases (included MEDLINE and EMBASE) and guideline websites were searched until/up to April, 2016. The methodological quality of the guidelines was assessed by four authors independently using the AGREEII instrument. Results: From 1366 citations, 58 relevant guidelines were included. The overall agreement among reviewers was moderate (Intra-class correlation coefficient=0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.84). The mean scores were moderate for the domains “scope and purpose” (53.54) and “rigor of development” (61.24), however, there were low for the domains “clarity of presentation” (24.36), “stakeholder involvement” (31.27), “applicability” (26.52) and “editorial independence” (28.45). Four sixths domains scores were lower when compared with international average level. There were 10(17.24%) guidelines described the systematic methods for searching. And only 9(15.52%) guidelines reported methodological expertise were included in guideline developing teams. According to the AGREEII instrument, 7 guidelines can be strongly recommended, 16 with provisos and alterations while the remaining cannot be recommended for adaptation due to poor methodological quality. Meanwhile, we didn't find the difference in six domains quality related to publication year of AGREEII (before or after 2010). Meanwhile, guidelines published in guideline databases were significantly have a higher scores than that in journals. Conclusion: Although existing inflammatory bowel disease guidelines may accurately reflect agreed clinical practice, many guidelines lack proper methodological quality. Future guidelines should place more emphasis on these methodological shortcoming and provide high-quality guidelines for clinical decision-making in this field.Figure 1

Distinguishing ASH Clinical Practice Guidelines from Other Forms of ASH Clinical Advice

The American Society of Addiction Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline Development Methodology

Clinical practice guidelines for adolescent and young adult cancer: A literature review.

CME CLINICAL COMMENTARY REVIEW: Patient Centered Practice Guidelines: GRADEing Evidence to Incorporate Certainty, Balance Between Benefits and Harms, Equity, Feasibility, and Cost-Effectiveness

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

Evaluating clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer: Did they get it RIGHT?

Results from the BJD survey on readership views towards clinical practice guidelines

Finding a needle in a haystack: The identification of clinical practice guidelines for psychosocial oncology through an environmental scan of the academic and gray literature

Decision Theoretical Foundations of Clinical Practice Guidelines: an Extension of the ASH Thrombophilia Guidelines

Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide

Evaluation of reporting quality in clinical practice guidelines for acute myeloid leukemia using the RIGHT checklist

Determining the future role of clinical practice guidelines: The experience of Australia and New Zealand

Decomposing clinical practice guidelines panels' deliberation into decision theoretical constructs

Development and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update and Synthesis of the Literature With a Focus in Application to Spinal Conditions

An Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Attitude Should We Have Towards the Guidelines?

Clinical practice guidelines for management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: an AGREE II appraisal

Physician perspectives about the diagnosis and management of acute chest syndrome

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and cancer

Distinguishing Clinical from Statistical Significances in Contemporary Comparative Effectiveness Research

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Colon Cancer

Harmonization of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure/Hypertension Guidelines