Abstract:Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly favored over other genomic sequencing methods for clinical applications due to its comprehensive coverage and declining costs. WGS is particularly useful for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs), presumed to be more accurate than targeted sequencing assays such as WES or gene panels, because it can identify breakpoints in addition to changes in coverage depth. Recent advancements in bioinformatics tools, including those employing hardware acceleration and machine learning, have enhanced CNV detection. Although numerous benchmarking studies have been published, primarily focusing on open-source tools for short-read WGS CNV calling, systematic evaluations that encompass commercially available tools that meet the rigorous demands of clinical testing are still necessary. In clinical settings, where the confirmation of reported CNVs is often required, there is a higher priority on sensitivity over specificity/precision compared to research applications. Moreover, clinical gene panel reporting primarily concerns whether a CNV affects coding regions or, in some cases, promoters, rather than the precise detection of breakpoints. This study aims to benchmark the performance of various CNV detection tools tailored for clinical reporting from WGS using reference cell lines, providing insights critical for optimizing clinical diagnostics. Our results indicate that while different tools exhibit strengths in either sensitivity or precision and are better suited for certain classes and lengths of variants, few can deliver the balanced performance essential for clinical testing, where high sensitivity is imperative. Generally, callers demonstrate better performance for deletions than duplications, with the latter being poorly detected in events shorter than 5kb. We demonstrate that the DRAGEN™ v4.2 CNV caller, particularly with custom filters on its high sensitivity mode, offers a superior balance of sensitivity and precision compared to other available tools.

Erds-Pe: A Paired Hidden Markov Model for Copy Number Variant Detection from Whole-Exome Sequencing Data

Exomehmm: A Hidden Markov Model for Detecting Copy Number Variation Using Whole-Exome Sequencing Data

Detection of Copy Number Variants and Loss of Heterozygosity from Impure Tumor Samples Using Whole Exome Sequencing Data.

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

PEcnv: accurate and efficient detection of copy number variations of various lengths

SeqCNV: a Novel Method for Identification of Copy Number Variations in Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Allele-specific Copy-Number Discovery from Whole-Genome and Whole-Exome Sequencing

Modeling Read Counts for Cnv Detection in Exome Sequencing Data

DL-CNV: A Deep Learning Method for Identifying Copy Number Variations Based on Next Generation Target Sequencing

Evaluation of Somatic Copy Number Estimation Tools for Whole-Exome Sequencing Data

ECOLE: Learning to call copy number variants on whole exome sequencing data

Copy Number Analysis Of Whole-Genome Data Using Bic-Seq2 And Its Application To Detection Of Cancer Susceptibility Variants

Identification of copy number variants in whole-genome data using Reference Coverage Profiles

CNV-P: a machine-learning framework for predicting high confident copy number variations

SCCNV: A Software Tool for Identifying Copy Number Variation From Single-Cell Whole-Genome Sequencing

BMI-CNV: A Bayesian framework for multiple genotyping platforms detection of copy number variation

Evaluation of tools for identifying large copy number variations from ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data

Copy Number Variation Detection Using Total Variation

Benchmarking of Germline Copy Number Variant Callers from Whole Genome Sequencing Data for Clinical Applications

An Exome Sequencing Pipeline for Identifying and Genotyping Common CNVs Associated with Disease with Application to Psoriasis

A robust statistical method for Genome-wide association analysis of human copy number variation