Risk factors for acute care hospital readmission in persons aged 60 and over from western countries: a systematic review protocol
Mona Kyndi Pedersen,Gabriele Meyer,Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2014-1170
2014-02-01
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
Abstract:Review question/objective The objective of this systematic review is to identify and synthesize the best available evidence on risk factors for acute care hospital readmission in older people. More specifically, the review question is: What are the main risk factors for acute care hospital readmission within one month of discharge in people aged 60 years or older from western countries? Background In most western countries the population is aging. Both the number of older persons is increasing as well as the complexity of their health needs. In addition, advances in medical science have enabled more active treatment for people with multiple co‐morbidities and patients in health care, on average, need more intensive management.1 This is placing additional pressure on clinical time and resources within health care services and support.2 Limiting rising costs and increasing ‘efficiency’ is a leading policy goal in all health care systems and health units, including hospitals. Different initiatives have been undertaken to limit costs, including reducing the average length of hospital stay and decreasing the number of beds in hospitals.1 Hospital readmission, defined as a return to hospital shortly after discharge from a recent hospital stay,3, 4 has been reported over a considerable period of time,5, 6 as a common negative health outcome from hospitalization of older persons.3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 Readmission rates are used as indicators of quality of hospital care.14 The reported rates of readmission vary across populations, countries, hospitals and medical specialities.4,10 A report from the Danish Health and Medicines Authority has found for example, that one out of five persons aged 67 and over was readmitted within 30 days of discharge.15 A French prospective multi‐center study found the hospital readmission rate to be 14%, varying between hospitals and ranging from 9.8 to 17%.9 A retrospective cohort study from the USA found the incidence of hospital readmission to be 17%.3 Hospital readmission is emotionally upsetting for many older persons and an unnecessary burden of illness, leading to anxiety and distress.11,12 Being transferred from one setting to another may be experienced as a critical event; unpredictable, scary and stressful for the person being transferred.12 Unplanned readmissions of recently discharged patients also impose a significant burden on hospitals with limited bed capacity and ressources.13 The literature relating to hospital readmissions identifies a subset of patients who may be categorized as ‘risk‐patients’.3,14 The term older person varies across countries, across diverse populations and cultures within countries. Cheek refers to different categories of being old;1 ‘young‐old’, ‘old‐old’ or ‘oldest‐old’, in the range of people known as older. According to the WHO, in most developed countries the chronological age of 65 years is accepted as a definition of becoming an ‘older person’ ‐ equivalent to retirement age.17 An agreed United Nations (UN) decision defines the age 60+ as the cut off for a person being old.17 The category of older persons ‘at risk’, understood as clinically, complex and frail persons,18 is characterized by co‐morbid conditions,16 polypharmacy19 and at increased risk of negative outcomes and future readmission.18,20 Not meeting the specific needs of these patients can make them become ‘frequent flyers’; patients who keep bouncing back to hospital.21 Identifying the characteristics of this group of patients may distinguish patients most likely to benefit from interventions and thereby lead to substantial reductions in the rate of hospital readmissions among older persons.8,21 In this systematic review the term ‘risk’ refers to the probability of a deleterious or adverse outcome during everyday life, or an exposure to a risk factor.22 An initial literature review was undertaken for the development of this protocol. This suggests that a varying range of hospital readmissions in different settings13 and populations21 may have been avoidable and could have been prevented.11,14 Second, it clarified that a number of studies have been undertaken to identify risk factors for hospital readmission in older persons and that these suggest that hospital readmissions among older persons are related to unmet complex care needs23 and a mix of health‐related and social factors.4,5,10,24,25 The literature identifies not only demographic variables (age, gender, diagnosis, co morbidities) as risk factors, but also conditions related to functional status and cognitive function. Other risk factors that have been highlighted are discharge and health care system related factors such as length of stay and the number of previous hospitalizations.3 A recent systematic review summarizing prospective cohort studies found that risk factors as well as protective factors for hospital readmission, such as being a woman and life satisfaction, differed according to the follow up period.10 The evidence base identified by the initial literature review comprised a range of study designs, data sources, patient populations, settings and age groups. It also showed a lack of consistency of study objectives, definitions and outcome measures. The evidence base identified by the initial literature review revealed no systematic review dealing with the same topic. The proposed systematic review is motivated firstly by the absence of a systematic review on the topic within the last three years. Secondly, by the importance of hospital administrators and policy having access to the best available evidence on risk factors for hospital readmissions in older persons, in order to design effective strategies to reduce readmissions.