Status and Risk Factors in Patients Requiring Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Readmission Within 48 Hours: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study in China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S399829
2023-03-11
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Yan-Ling Yin, 1, &ast Mei-Rong Sun, 1, &ast Kun Zhang, 1 Yu-Hong Chen, 1 Jie Zhang, 1 Shao-Kun Zhang, 1 Li-Li Zhou, 1 Yan-Shuo Wu, 1 Peng Gao, 1 Kang-Kang Shen, 1 Zhen-Jie Hu 1, 2 1 Department of ICU, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China; 2 Hebei Key Laboratory of Critical Disease Mechanism and Intervention, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Zhen-Jie Hu, Tel +86-0311-86095588, Email Aim: This study investigated the current status and related risk factors of 48-hour unplanned return to the intensive care unit (ICU) to reduce the return rate and improve the quality of critical care management. Methods: Data were collected from 2365 patients discharged from the comprehensive ICU. Multivariate and 1:1 propensity score matching analyses were performed. Results: Forty patients (1.69%) had unplanned readmission to the ICU within 48 hours after transfer. The primary reason for return was respiratory failure (16 patients, 40%). Furthermore, respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] = 5.994, p = 0.02) and the number of organ failures (OR = 5.679, p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for unplanned ICU readmission. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn for the predictive value of the number of organ injuries during a patient's unplanned transfer to the ICU (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.744, sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 77.5%). Conclusion: The reason for patient transfer and the number of organ injuries during the process were independent risk factors for patients who were critically ill. The number of organs damaged had a predictive value on whether the patient would return to the ICU within 48 hours. Keywords: risk factors, 48-hour unplanned readmission, comprehensive ICU, propensity-matched study, respiratory failure A hospital's intensive care unit (ICU) focuses on treating critically ill patients. After stabilising the patient's condition, they are transferred to the relevant hospital department to continue treatment. Unplanned ICU readmission is when a patient is readmitted to the ICU for treatment during the same hospitalisation for various reasons, such as a short-duration aggravated condition. Studies have shown that patients returning to the ICU have a worse prognosis, with increased hospital fatality rates, significantly longer hospital stays, and increased medical and financial burdens. 1–4 A study in the US showed that up to 14% of all ICU discharges could be readmitted. 5 Presently, unplanned readmission to the ICU within 48 hours is used as a sensitive indicator of clinical medical quality. 6 A retrospective review of readmission studies showed that at least 10% of all readmissions were preventable. 7 Therefore, research on and discoveries of the risk factors for unplanned return to the ICU can promote further actions to reduce return incidences. Patient disease severity is important in predicting unplanned ICU readmission. 6 The current tools to measure patient severity are mainly the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). However, studies have not yet reached a unified conclusion on the risk factors of unplanned ICU readmissions. 6,8–11 In addition, limited studies have examined unplanned ICU readmittance within 48 hours. Since ICU readmissions correlate with complex and severe illnesses, readmission rates require case-mix adjustment before they can be adequately interpreted as quality measures. Therefore, this study investigated the current status and related risk factors of a 48-hour unplanned return to the ICU. In addition, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to align the baseline characteristics of patients with unintended transfers back to the ICU to eliminate any confounding factors. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of unplanned ICU (43 beds) readmissions in XX Medical University in China from January 2016 to December 2019. Informed consent was obtained either from the patient or by proxy. The study protocol was approved by an institutional research ethics committee (approval number: 2022KS021). This research did not receive specific grants from funding agencies in public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Readmission was defined as discharge to an area that provided lower levels of care followed by a return to the same or different ICU during the same hospital stay. We exc -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services