Prevalence, Timing, and Impact of Early Recurrence of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias after Pulsed Field Ablation: A Secondary Analysis of the PULSED AF Trial

Lucas V.A. Boersma,Andrea Natale,David Haines,David DeLurgio,Nitesh Sood,Francis Marchlinski,Hugh Calkins,Robert H. Hoyt,Prashanthan Sanders,James Irwin,Douglas Packer,Suneet Mittal,Sarfraz Durrani,Luigi DiBiase,Robert Sangrigoli,Hiroshi Tada,Tetsuo Sasano,Hirofumi Tomita,Teiichi Yamane,Karl-Heinz Kuck,Oussama Wazni,Khaldoun Tarakji,Jeffrey Cerkvenik,Kelly A. van Bragt,Bob G.S. Abeln,Atul Verma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.036
IF: 6.779
2024-06-26
Heart Rhythm
Abstract:Background Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERATs) within three months following thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and often considered transient. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy source in which ERAT is not well described. Objective To analyze ERAT in AF patients undergoing PFA in the PULSED AF trial. Methods This analysis included 294 patients (154 paroxysmal, 140 persistent AF) that had ≥10 rhythm assessments during the 90-day blanking period. ERAT was defined as any instance of ≥30s of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia on trans-telephonic monitoring (weekly and symptomatic) or ≥10s on ECG (at 3 months), both within 90 days. Late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (LRATs) was defined as observed atrial tachyarrhythmias between 90 days and 12 months. Results The overall prevalence of ERAT was 27.1% in paroxysmal and 31.6% in persistent AF patients. In patients with ERAT, 73% had ERAT onset within the first month post-procedure. Presence of ERAT was associated with LRAT in paroxysmal (HR 6.4 (95% c.i. 3.6-11.3)) and persistent (HR 3.8 (95% c.i. 2.2-6.6)) AF patients. Yet, in 29.4% of paroxysmal and 34.3% of persistent AF patients with ERAT, LRAT was not observed. LRAT was positively correlated with the number of ERAT observations. Conclusion ERAT post PFA predicted LRAT in paroxysmal and persistent AF patients. However, the concept of a blanking period post PFA is still valid as approximately 1/3 of patients with ERAT did not continue on to LRAT during follow-up and may not need re-ablation.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?