Long‐term clinical impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Jinsun Park,Myung‐Jin Cha,Chang Hee Kwon,Min Soo Cho,Gi‐Byoung Nam,Il‐Young Oh,So‐Ryoung Lee,Ju Youn Kim,Sung Ho Lee,Junbeom Park,Ki‐Hun Kim,Pil‐Sung Yang,Jun Hyung Kim,Jaemin Shim,Hong Euy Lim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16334
IF: 2.7
2024-06-20
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Introduction The impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) within the 90‐day blanking period on long‐term outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is controversial. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (LRAT) post‐CBA. Methods Utilizing data from a multicenter registry in Korea (May 2018 to June 2022), we analyzed the presence and timing of ERAT (<30, 30–60, and 60–90 days) and its association with LRAT risk after CBA. LRAT was defined as any recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 s beyond the 90 days. Results Out of 2636 patients, 745 (28.2%) experienced ERAT post‐CBA. Over an average follow‐up period of 21.2 ± 10.3 months, LRAT was observed in 874 (33.1%) patients. Patients with ERAT had significantly lower 1‐year LRAT freedom compared to those without ERAT (42.6% vs. 85.5%, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?