Abstract:Objective: To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of lung transplantation. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 27 lung transplant patients who underwent ERAS during the perioperative period, while 12 lung transplant patients receiving routine treatment served as controls. General information was collected, including the specific implementation plan of ERAS, the incidence of complications and survival rate during the perioperative period (<30 d), postoperative hospitalization indicators, the postoperative length of stay, and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores. Results: Comparison of postoperative hospitalization indicators, the ERAS group compared with the control group, there were significant differences in postoperative ICU stay time (2.0(2.0,4.0) vs 4.5(3.0,6.0), p = 0.005), postoperative hospital stay time (18(15,26) vs 24(19.5,32.75), p = 0.016), duration of nasogastric tube (3(2,3) vs 4(2.25,4.75), p = 0.023), and first ambulation time (4(3,5) vs 5.8(4.5,7.5), p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation time, time to eat after surgery, duration of urinary catheter and duration of chest tube between the ERAS group and the control group (p>0.05). The perioperative survival of the ERAS group was 81.5%, which was higher than the control group (66.7%), but there is no statistically significant difference. Comparison of post-extubation NRS scores, the ERAS group had lower NRS scores at 12 h (5.30 ± 0.14 vs 6.25 ± 0.75), 24 h (3.44 ± 0.64 vs 5.58 ± 0.9), 48 h (2.74 ± 0.66 vs 4.08 ± 0.79) and 72 h (1.11 ± 0.80 vs 2.33 ± 0.49) than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). Intra-group comparison, post-extubation 12 h comparison post-extubation 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, the NRS scores showed a gradual downward trend, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). In the comparison of perioperative complications, the ERAS group had a lower postoperative infection incidence than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (44.4% vs 83.3%, p = 0.037). The ERAS group had lower postoperative delirium incidence than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (11.1% vs 50%, p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection, primary graft loss (PGD), gastrointestinal (GI) complications and airway complications between two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The ERAS can be applied to lung transplant patients to relieve postoperative pain, shorten postoperative tube time, and shorten postoperative stay. Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation exercises are beneficial to reducing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Enhanced recovery after surgery may mitigate the risks associated with robotic-assisted fundoplication in lung transplant patients

A Novel Tubeless Urinary Catheter Protocol Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery

Clinical Guidelines on Perioperative Management Strategies for Enhanced Recovery after Lung Surgery.

Early Outcomes of Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Clinical efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Discussion of the experience and improvement of an enhanced recovery after surgery procedure for minimally invasive lobectomy: a cohort study

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy

Outcomes comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open surgery for patients undergoing rectal cancer resection with concurrent stoma creation

Robotic‐assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Improves Perioperative Outcomes in Overweight and Obese Patients with Non–small‐cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Lobectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Enhanced recovery and reduced conversion rates in robotic rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Enhanced recovery of postoperative nursing for single-port thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients

Oncologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an ACS-NSQIP analysis

The application of ERAS in the perioperative period management of patients for lung transplantation

Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients

How does robotic anti-reflux surgery compare with traditional open and laparoscopic techniques: a cost and outcomes analysis

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients

Robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair may be associated with improved wound morbidity in high-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Increased Adoption and Improved Outcomes - Is Laparoscopy Still Justified?

The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

Preoperative Factors for Success of Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction for Distal Ureteral Strictures

Postoperative Management of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery