Abstract:Objective::To explore the incidence, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of suction loss cases during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Methods::In this retrospective non-comparative review of case series studies, 16 eyes of 16 patients occurred suction loss in 3 365 consecutive SMILE procedures between June 2016 and March 2019 in the Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University. They were analyzed for the incidence, the eye, the gender, the locations of suction loss, the instant rotated directions of the eyes during the suction loss, treatments, and prognoses. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test.Results::This study included totally 3 365 eyes (1 692 right eyes, 1 673 left eyes) of 1 698 consecutive patients (517 males, 1 181 females). Suction loss occurred in 16 patients (16 eyes), including 9 right eyes (9/16), 7 left eyes (7/16), from 5 males (5/16) and 11 females (11/16). The incidence of suction loss was 0.46%. There were no significant difference between the loss of aspiration and gender ( χ2=0.005, P=0.944), and eye ( χ2=0.229, P=0.632). Suction loss was located at the laser scanning diameter of 3.62±2.55 mm, mostly within the diameter of 2 mm. The eyes were categorized by suction loss interface and managements: 4 eyes had suction loss in the lenticule interface (1/4), 2 of which were changed to femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) immediately, and the other 2 eyes were converted to laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) at once; 1 eye occurred suction loss during lenticule side cut (1/16), and changed to LASEK immediately; 10 eyes had suction loss in the cap interface (5/8), of which 8 eyes promptly redocked and restarted cap and removed the lenticule completely, 1 eye underwent SMILE procedure in 3 weeks later. 1 eye immediately redocked and followed the re-SMILE same cap procedure, in which case, however, another suction loss occurred and the LASEK was performed in 2 weeks later. 1 eye had suction loss in small incision (1/16), and the small incision was cut with a 5 ml injection needle with the lenticule completely removed. The 16 eyes with suction loss were also categorized by the instant rotation directions in suction loss: 9 eyes in upper temporal (9/16), 2 eyes in lower temporal (1/8), 2 eyes in upper nasal (1/8), 2 eyes in lower nasal (1/8) and 1 eye in down (1/16). The uncorrected visual acuity of all the suction loss cases achieved the preoperative best corrected visual acuity 3 months after surgery. Conclusions::Suction loss during SMILE is rare. It mostly occurs in cap interface and near the center of the pupil. Bell's reflexes the main cause of suction loss. Different sites and states of suction loss should have different managements and properstrategies will not affect the long-term postoperative visual acuity.

Impact of Suction Loss During Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Risk Factors and Incidence of Suction Loss during Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in 8487 eyes

Management of Suction Loss During SMILE in 12,057 Eyes: Incidence, Outcomes, Risk Factors, and a Novel Method of Same-Day Recutting of Refractive Lenticules.

Risk Factors and Incidence of Suction Loss During Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in 8493 Eyes

Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

The Incidence and Characteristics of Suction Loss in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedures

Options and Results in Managing Suction Loss During Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: An 18-Month Prospective Study.

Clinical Outcomes after Smile and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lasik for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

Comparison of outcome between small incision lenticule extraction and FS-LASIK in eyes having refractive error greater than negative 10 diopters

Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.

Early Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality after Femtosecond Laser Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism Correction of Over-10 Dioptres

Differences in the Corneal Biomechanical Changes after SMILE and LASIK.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Corneal Sensation Between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (smile) and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Lasik for Myopia

Comparison of the Visual Results after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Long-Term Visual Quality and Pupil Changes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Eyes without Preoperative Cylinder Refraction

Five‐year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS‐LASIK) for myopia

Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism

Comparison of Visual Quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK