Abstract:Objective::To explore the incidence, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of suction loss cases during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Methods::In this retrospective non-comparative review of case series studies, 16 eyes of 16 patients occurred suction loss in 3 365 consecutive SMILE procedures between June 2016 and March 2019 in the Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University. They were analyzed for the incidence, the eye, the gender, the locations of suction loss, the instant rotated directions of the eyes during the suction loss, treatments, and prognoses. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test.Results::This study included totally 3 365 eyes (1 692 right eyes, 1 673 left eyes) of 1 698 consecutive patients (517 males, 1 181 females). Suction loss occurred in 16 patients (16 eyes), including 9 right eyes (9/16), 7 left eyes (7/16), from 5 males (5/16) and 11 females (11/16). The incidence of suction loss was 0.46%. There were no significant difference between the loss of aspiration and gender ( χ2=0.005, P=0.944), and eye ( χ2=0.229, P=0.632). Suction loss was located at the laser scanning diameter of 3.62±2.55 mm, mostly within the diameter of 2 mm. The eyes were categorized by suction loss interface and managements: 4 eyes had suction loss in the lenticule interface (1/4), 2 of which were changed to femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) immediately, and the other 2 eyes were converted to laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) at once; 1 eye occurred suction loss during lenticule side cut (1/16), and changed to LASEK immediately; 10 eyes had suction loss in the cap interface (5/8), of which 8 eyes promptly redocked and restarted cap and removed the lenticule completely, 1 eye underwent SMILE procedure in 3 weeks later. 1 eye immediately redocked and followed the re-SMILE same cap procedure, in which case, however, another suction loss occurred and the LASEK was performed in 2 weeks later. 1 eye had suction loss in small incision (1/16), and the small incision was cut with a 5 ml injection needle with the lenticule completely removed. The 16 eyes with suction loss were also categorized by the instant rotation directions in suction loss: 9 eyes in upper temporal (9/16), 2 eyes in lower temporal (1/8), 2 eyes in upper nasal (1/8), 2 eyes in lower nasal (1/8) and 1 eye in down (1/16). The uncorrected visual acuity of all the suction loss cases achieved the preoperative best corrected visual acuity 3 months after surgery. Conclusions::Suction loss during SMILE is rare. It mostly occurs in cap interface and near the center of the pupil. Bell's reflexes the main cause of suction loss. Different sites and states of suction loss should have different managements and properstrategies will not affect the long-term postoperative visual acuity.

Management of Suction Loss During SMILE in 12,057 Eyes: Incidence, Outcomes, Risk Factors, and a Novel Method of Same-Day Recutting of Refractive Lenticules.

Risk Factors and Incidence of Suction Loss during Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in 8487 eyes

Risk Factors and Incidence of Suction Loss During Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in 8493 Eyes

Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures

The Incidence and Characteristics of Suction Loss in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedures

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in Situ Keratomileusis in Patients with Deep Corneal Opacity: Case Series.

Complications of Corneal Small Incision Lenticular Extraction: A Retrospective Analysis of 106 Eyes

[Difficulties in Lenticule Extraction During Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with the Continuous Curvilinear Lenticulerrhexis Technique].

Early Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality after Femtosecond Laser Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism Correction of Over-10 Dioptres

SMILE for Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism: Results of a Prospective Multicenter 12-Month Study

Early Changes to Dry Eye and Ocular Surface after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia.

Two-year Outcome of a Patient after LASIK Following SMILE Lenticule in Situ Implantation to Treat a Rare Complication

Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: An 18-Month Prospective Study.

Research Progress on Ocular Surface Changes after Fem- Tosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Refractive Outcomes Comparing Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction And Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis For High Myopia

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Long-Term Visual Quality and Pupil Changes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Eyes without Preoperative Cylinder Refraction

12-Month Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction With Proper Head Positioning but No Reference Marking for the Correction of Astigmatism

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia: Seven-Year Outcomes of Refraction, Corneal Tomography, and Wavefront Aberrations

Four-Year Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Extreme High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): Myths and Realities