Six Versus Twelve Months Clopidogrel Therapy after Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: an ISAR-SAFE Study Subgroup Analysis.

Raphaela Lohaus,Jonathan Michel,Katharina Mayer,Anna Lena Lahmann,Robert A. Byrne,Annabelle Wolk,Jurrien M. ten Berg,Franz-Josef Neumann,Yaling Han,Tom Adriaenssens,Ralph Tölg,Melchior Seyfarth,Michael Maeng,Bernhard Zrenner,Claudius Jacobshagen,Jochen Wöhrle,Sebastian Kufner,Tanja Morath,Tareq Ibrahim,Isabell Bernlochner,Marcus Fischer,Heribert Schunkert,Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz,Julinda Mehilli,Adnan Kastrati,Stefanie Schulz-Schüpke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33054
IF: 4.6
2016-01-01
Scientific Reports
Abstract:In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. At 6 months after intervention, patients receiving clopidogrel were randomly assigned to either a further 6-month period of placebo or clopidogrel. The primary composite endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding 9 months after randomization. The ISAR-SAFE trial was terminated early due to low event rates and slow recruitment. 1601/4000 (40.0%) patients presented with ACS and were randomized to 6 (n = 794) or 12 months (n = 807) clopidogrel. The primary endpoint occurred in 14 patients (1.8%) receiving 6 months of clopidogrel and 17 patients (2.2%) receiving 12 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–1.68, P = 0.60. There were 2 (0.3%) cases of stent thrombosis in each group; HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.14–7.09, P = >0.99. Major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (0.4%) receiving 6 months clopidogrel and 5 (0.6%) receiving 12 months; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.15–2.49, P = 0.49. There was no significant difference in net clinical outcomes after DES implantation in ACS patients treated with 6 versus 12 months clopidogrel. Ischaemic and bleeding events were low beyond 6-months.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?