Abstract:Background: Biomedical ontologies pose several challenges to ontology matching due both to the complexity of the biomedical domain and to the characteristics of the ontologies themselves. The biomedical tracks in the Ontology Matching Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) have spurred the development of matching systems able to tackle these challenges, and benchmarked their general performance. In this study, we dissect the strategies employed by matching systems to tackle the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies and gauge the impact of the challenges themselves on matching performance, using the AgreementMakerLight (AML) system as the platform for this study. Results: We demonstrate that the linear complexity of the hash-based searching strategy implemented by most state-of-the-art ontology matching systems is essential for matching large biomedical ontologies efficiently. We show that accounting for all lexical annotations (e.g., labels and synonyms) in biomedical ontologies leads to a substantial improvement in F-measure over using only the primary name, and that accounting for the reliability of different types of annotations generally also leads to a marked improvement. Finally, we show that cross-references are a reliable source of information and that, when using biomedical ontologies as background knowledge, it is generally more reliable to use them as mediators than to perform lexical expansion. Conclusions: We anticipate that translating traditional matching algorithms to the hash-based searching paradigm will be a critical direction for the future development of the field. Improving the evaluation carried out in the biomedical tracks of the OAEI will also be important, as without proper reference alignments there is only so much that can be ascertained about matching systems or strategies. Nevertheless, it is clear that, to tackle the various challenges posed by biomedical ontologies, ontology matching systems must be able to efficiently combine multiple strategies into a mature matching approach.

Leveraging Structural Information in Ontology Matching

ERSOM: A Structural Ontology Matching Approach Using Automatically Learned Entity Representation.

An Effective Similarity Propagation Method for Matching Ontologies Without Sufficient or Regular Linguistic Information

Interactive Cross-Lingual Ontology Matching

Ontology Matching Based On Probabilistic Description Logic

A Unified Approach to Matching Semantic Data on the Web

Optimizing Alignment Selection in Ontology Matching Via Homomorphism Constraint

Evaluating The Stability And Credibility Of Ontology Matching Methods

A Differentor-Based Adaptive Ontology-Matching Approach

OM4OV: Leveraging Ontology Matching for Ontology Versioning

An Inter-lingual Reference Approach For Multi-Lingual Ontology Matching

Matching Transportation Ontologies with Word2Vec and Alignment Extraction Algorithm

Matching Large Scale Ontology Effectively

Matching Large Ontologies: A Divide-and-conquer Approach

Agent-OM: Leveraging LLM Agents for Ontology Matching

Evaluating Ontology Matching Systems on Large, Multilingual and Real-world Test Cases

Matching Weak Informative Ontologies

Tackling the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies

Actively Learning Ontology Matching via User Interaction

An Ontology Matching Approach Based on Affinity-Preserving Random Walks

A Similarity Graph Matching Approach for Instance Disambiguation.