Abstract:Studying developers’ behavior in software development tasks is crucial for designing effective techniques and tools to support developers’ daily work. In modern software development, developers frequently use different applications including IDEs, Web Browsers, documentation software (such as Office Word, Excel, and PDF applications), and other tools to complete their tasks. This creates significant challenges in collecting and analyzing developers’ behavior data. Researchers usually instrument the software tools to log developers’ behavior for further studies. This is feasible for studies on development activities using specific software tools. However, instrumenting all software tools commonly used in real work settings is difficult and requires significant human effort. Furthermore, the collected behavior data consist of low-level and fine-grained event sequences, which must be abstracted into high-level development activities for further analysis. This abstraction is often performed manually or based on simple heuristics. In this paper, we propose an approach to address the above two challenges in collecting and analyzing developers’ behavior data. First, we use our ActivitySpace framework to improve the generalizability of the data collection. ActivitySpace uses operating-system level instrumentation to track developer interactions with a wide range of applications in real work settings. Secondly, we use a machine learning approach to reduce the human effort to abstract low-level behavior data. Specifically, considering the sequential nature of the interaction data, we propose a Condition Random Field (CRF) based approach to segment and label the developers’ low-level actions into a set of basic, yet meaningful development activities. To validate the generalizability of the proposed data collection approach, we deploy the ActivitySpace framework in an industry partner’s company and collect the real working data from ten professional developers’ one-week work in three actual software projects. The experiment with the collected data confirms that with initial human-labeled training data, the CRF model can be trained to infer development activities from low-level actions with reasonable accuracy within and across developers and software projects. This suggests that the machine learning approach is promising in reducing the human efforts required for behavior data analysis.

BPMiner: mining developers' behavior patterns from screen-captured task videos.

Reverse Engineering Time-Series Interaction Data from Screen-Captured Videos.

Extracting and Analyzing Time-Series HCI Data from Screen-Captured Task Videos

Scvripper: Video Scraping Tool for Modeling Developers' Behavior Using Interaction Data

Inference of Development Activities from Interaction with Uninstrumented Applications

Enhancing Developer Interactions with Programming Screencasts Through Accurate Code Extraction

Interest Mining in Virtual Learning Environments

Measuring Program Comprehension: A Large-Scale Field Study with Professionals

BUILDING USER TASK SPACE BY MINING TEMPORALLY PROXIMATE DESKTOP ACTIONS

[Journal First] Measuring Program Comprehension: A Large-Scale Field Study with Professionals

VT-Revolution: Interactive Programming Video Tutorial Authoring and Watching System

VT-revolution: Interactive Programming Tutorials Made Possible.

SeeHow: Workflow Extraction from Programming Screencasts through Action-Aware Video Analytics

Modeling strategic use of human computer interfaces with novel hidden Markov models

Behavioral Petri Net Mining and Automated Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction Recommendations in Multi-Application Environments

User Behavior Mining

What do all these Buttons do? Statically Mining Android User Interfaces at Scale

Mining micro-practices from operational data

SCSMiner: Mining Social Coding Sites for Software Developer Recommendation with Relevance Propagation.

Bot Log Mining

A Two-Layered Framework for the Discovery of Software Behavior: A Case Study