Abstract:Studying developers’ behavior in software development tasks is crucial for designing effective techniques and tools to support developers’ daily work. In modern software development, developers frequently use different applications including IDEs, Web Browsers, documentation software (such as Office Word, Excel, and PDF applications), and other tools to complete their tasks. This creates significant challenges in collecting and analyzing developers’ behavior data. Researchers usually instrument the software tools to log developers’ behavior for further studies. This is feasible for studies on development activities using specific software tools. However, instrumenting all software tools commonly used in real work settings is difficult and requires significant human effort. Furthermore, the collected behavior data consist of low-level and fine-grained event sequences, which must be abstracted into high-level development activities for further analysis. This abstraction is often performed manually or based on simple heuristics. In this paper, we propose an approach to address the above two challenges in collecting and analyzing developers’ behavior data. First, we use our ActivitySpace framework to improve the generalizability of the data collection. ActivitySpace uses operating-system level instrumentation to track developer interactions with a wide range of applications in real work settings. Secondly, we use a machine learning approach to reduce the human effort to abstract low-level behavior data. Specifically, considering the sequential nature of the interaction data, we propose a Condition Random Field (CRF) based approach to segment and label the developers’ low-level actions into a set of basic, yet meaningful development activities. To validate the generalizability of the proposed data collection approach, we deploy the ActivitySpace framework in an industry partner’s company and collect the real working data from ten professional developers’ one-week work in three actual software projects. The experiment with the collected data confirms that with initial human-labeled training data, the CRF model can be trained to infer development activities from low-level actions with reasonable accuracy within and across developers and software projects. This suggests that the machine learning approach is promising in reducing the human efforts required for behavior data analysis.

Mining micro-practices from operational data

BPMiner: mining developers' behavior patterns from screen-captured task videos.

Looking for micro-process in large-scale data

Inference of Development Activities from Interaction with Uninstrumented Applications

A Method To Identify And Correct Problematic Software Activity Data: Exploiting Capacity Constraints And Data Redundancies

Mining crowd sourcing repositories for open innovation in software engineering

Mining Software Engineering Data

Do Developers Adopt Green Architectural Tactics for ML-Enabled Systems? A Mining Software Repository Study

Software Artifact Mining in Software Engineering Conferences: A Meta-Analysis

Mining API Usage Examples from Test Code

Mining Usage Data from Large-Scale Android Users: Challenges and Opportunities.

Mining Succinct and High-Coverage API Usage Patterns from Source Code

A Mining Software Repository Extended Cookbook: Lessons learned from a literature review

PeaTMOSS: Mining Pre-Trained Models in Open-Source Software

OpenDigger: Data Mining and Information Service System for Open Collaboration Digital Ecosystem

Mining Extremely Small Data Sets with Application to Software Reuse

Mining architectural information: A systematic mapping study

Mining for sustainability in cloud architecture among the discussions of software practitioners: building a dataset

A Novel Approach for Automated Design Information Mining from Issue Logs

Mining Reviews in Open Source Code for Developers Trail: A Process Mining Approach