Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patient-measured home blood pressures alone can be used to manage hypertension in adults 65 years and older.METHODS: 40 hypertensive men and women, average age 73 +/- 6 years, were randomly assigned to one of two treatment decision groups. The 'home' group (N = 20) had blood pressure managed and medication changed according to measurements taken by the patient at home with the Omron HEM-702 semi-automatic oscillometric digital blood pressure monitor and the 'clinic' group (N = 20) had medication adjusted based upon readings taken by the project nurse in the clinic. In both groups, treated hypertensives had medications adjusted downward, while untreated hypertensives were started on a diuretic and/or ACE inhibitor and adjustments were made upward. To assess the efficacy of the home measurements as a means of hypertension management, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure averages, quality of life (From the QOL SF-36), and dosage of antihypertensive medications were compared between the home and clinic groups over a three-month period.RESULTS: At baseline, the 'home' group had slightly higher ambulatory awake and sleep blood pressure than the 'clinic' group. At 3 months, the average awake and sleep ambulatory blood pressure for the 'home' group decreased to the level of the 'clinic' group. Values of the 'clinic' group did not change. In both groups, pressures of previously treated patients increased over the 3 months, while those that were previously untreated declined. However, this difference, to some extent, might be expected because the acceptable limit of pressure control (150 / 90 mmHg) was higher than many of the patients on medications; thus, their pressures could increase and still be considered controlled. Those patients who were previously untreated had their pressures decreased only to this level. The nurse-measured clinic blood pressures for the 'home' group began higher than that of the 'clinic' group and remained higher at the end of the study. Average home pressures of the 'home' group were consistently lower than nurse-measured clinic pressures over the 3-month study period, indicating a persistent 'white coat' effect. Both groups had similar changes in total quality of life scores. Decrease/discontinuance of antihypertensive medication was also achieved equally in both groups at the end of 3 months.CONCLUSION: Home blood pressure monitoring alone may be as useful as clinic measurements for making treatment decisions in the elderly.

Sixty Seconds on . . . Measuring Blood Pressure

Blood Pressure Measurement Multicentre Trial

Home Blood Pressure Measurements Are Not Performed According to Guidelines and Standardized Education Is Urgently Needed

Number of measurement days needed for obtaining a reliable estimate of home blood pressure and hypertension status

Blood Pressure Measurements Obtained by Community-Dwelling Adults Are Similar to Nurse-Obtained Measurements: The SMART-BP Validate Study

S-56-2: HOME BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT FOR HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT IN THE REAL WORLD: THE IMPORTANCE OF REPORTING HOME BLOOD PRESSURE TO DOCTORS

Simultaneous 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement on both arms: a consideration for improving hypertension management

White-coat Hypertension on Automated Blood Pressure Measurement: Implications for Clinical Practice

Current practice of usual clinic blood pressure measurement in people with and without diabetes: a survey and prospective ‘mystery shopper’ study in UK primary care

Blood Pressure Measurement and Hypertension Diagnosis in the 2017 US Guidelines: First Things First.

Management of hypertension in the elderly using home blood pressures

1770 Assessment of lying and standing blood pressure; an audit leading to an improved clinical effectiveness and quality improvement

Achieving reliable blood pressure measurements in clinical practice: It's time to meet the challenge

Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension

Comparison of the Mean of the First Two Blood Pressure Readings with the Overall Mean of Three Readings on a Single Occasion.

May Measurement Month 2017: an Analysis of Blood Pressure Screening Results Worldwide.

Arm Position and Blood Pressure Readings: The ARMS Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial

Accuracy and Performance of Triage Blood Pressure Measurements in A Real-World Clinic Setting

Non-Invasive Systemic Blood Pressure Measurement Wait Period Error Mitigation

COMPARING BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL TARGETS GLOBALLY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE MAY MEASUREMENT MONTH 2022 CAMPAIGN IN 60 COUNTRIES

Days of Measuring and Times of Readings Needed for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Assessment of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients with Diabetes Mellitus