Abstract:Traditional power systems have evolved into cyber‐physical power systems (CPPS) with the integration of information and communication technologies. CPPS can be considered as a typical hierarchical control system that can be divided into two parts: the power grid and the communication network. CPPS will face new vulnerabilities which can have network contingencies and cascading consequences. To address this challenge, a virtual‐physical power flow (VPPF) method is proposed for the vulnerability assessment of CPPS. The proposed method contains dual power flows, one is to simulate a virtual power flow from decision‐making units, and the other is to simulate a physical power flow. In addition, a novel hierarchical control model is proposed that includes four layers of CPPS: the physical layer, the secondary device layer, the regional control layer, and the national control layer. The model is based on IEEE test cases using data and structures provided by MATPOWER. Denial‐of‐service (DoS) and false data injection (FDI) are simulated as two major cyber‐attacks in CPPS. A novel vulnerability index is proposed that consists of system voltage, network latency, and node betweenness as three key indicators. This is a comprehensive and adaptive index because it encompasses both cyber and physical system characteristics and can be applied to several types of cyber‐attacks. The results of the vulnerability assessment are compared in national and regional control structures of CPPS to evaluate the vulnerability of cyber‐physical nodes. Traditional power systems have evolved into cyber‐physical power systems (CPPS) with the integration of information and communication technologies. CPPS can be considered as a typical hierarchical control system that can be divided into two parts: the power grid and the communication network. CPPS will face new vulnerabilities which can have network contingencies and cascading consequences. To address this challenge, a virtual‐physical power flow (VPPF) method is proposed for the vulnerability assessment of CPPS. The proposed method contains dual power flows, one is to simulate a virtual power flow from decision‐making units, and the other is to simulate a physical power flow. In addition, a novel hierarchical control model is proposed that includes four layers of CPPS: the physical layer, the secondary device layer, the regional control layer, and the national control layer. The model is based on IEEE test cases using data and structures provided by MATPOWER. Denial‐of‐service (DoS) and false data injection (FDI) are simulated as two major cyber‐attacks in CPPS. A novel vulnerability index is proposed that consists of system voltage, network latency, and node betweenness as three key indicators. This is a comprehensive and adaptive index because it encompasses both cyber and physical system characteristics and can be applied to several types of cyber‐attacks. The results of the vulnerability assessment are compared in national and regional control structures of CPPS to evaluate the vulnerability of cyber‐physical nodes.

Robustness assessment of weakly coupled cyber-physical power systems under multi-stage attacks

An asymmetric interdependent networks model for cyber-physical systems

Robustness Improvement for Cyber Physical System Based on an Optimization Model of Interdependent Constraints

Optimal Coupling Pattern of Cyber-Physical Systems

Vulnerability Assessment of Electrical Cyber-Physical Systems Against Cyber Attacks

Analysis of Malware-Induced Cyber Attacks in Cyber-Physical Power Systems

Robustness assessment of the cyber‐physical system against cascading failure in a virtual power plant based on complex network theory

Vulnerability Assessment for Cyber Physical System of Distribution Network in Distributed Cooperative Control Mode

Resilience Evaluation of Cyber-Physical Power System Considering Cyber Attacks

Risk Assessment and Defense Resource Allocation of Cyber-Physical Distribution Systems under Denial-of-Service Attacks

Vulnerability assessment of cyber-physical power system considering virtual cyber-physical connections

Cascading Failure Analysis of Cyber Physical Power System With Multiple Interdependency and Control Threshold.

Modeling and Vulnerability Analysis of Cyber-Physical Power Systems Considering Network Topology and Power Flow Properties

A Game Theory-Based Approach For Vulnerability Analysis Of A Cyber-Physical Power System

Virtual‐physical power flow method for cyber‐physical power system contingency and vulnerability assessment

Cascading Failure Risk Assessment Based on Event-Driven Model in a Cyber-physical Power System

Attack Intention Oriented Dynamic Risk Propagation of Cyberattacks on Cyber-Physical Power Systems

Cross-Space Conduction Assessment Method of Network Attack Risk under the Strong Coupling Characteristics of Electric Power Cyber Physics

Revealing Vulnerability of N-1 Secure Power Systems to Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks

Modeling and Fault Propagation Analysis of Cyber–Physical Power System

Dynamics of cascading failure in cyber-physical power systems from cyber attack