Abstract:Traditional power systems have evolved into cyber‐physical power systems (CPPS) with the integration of information and communication technologies. CPPS can be considered as a typical hierarchical control system that can be divided into two parts: the power grid and the communication network. CPPS will face new vulnerabilities which can have network contingencies and cascading consequences. To address this challenge, a virtual‐physical power flow (VPPF) method is proposed for the vulnerability assessment of CPPS. The proposed method contains dual power flows, one is to simulate a virtual power flow from decision‐making units, and the other is to simulate a physical power flow. In addition, a novel hierarchical control model is proposed that includes four layers of CPPS: the physical layer, the secondary device layer, the regional control layer, and the national control layer. The model is based on IEEE test cases using data and structures provided by MATPOWER. Denial‐of‐service (DoS) and false data injection (FDI) are simulated as two major cyber‐attacks in CPPS. A novel vulnerability index is proposed that consists of system voltage, network latency, and node betweenness as three key indicators. This is a comprehensive and adaptive index because it encompasses both cyber and physical system characteristics and can be applied to several types of cyber‐attacks. The results of the vulnerability assessment are compared in national and regional control structures of CPPS to evaluate the vulnerability of cyber‐physical nodes. Traditional power systems have evolved into cyber‐physical power systems (CPPS) with the integration of information and communication technologies. CPPS can be considered as a typical hierarchical control system that can be divided into two parts: the power grid and the communication network. CPPS will face new vulnerabilities which can have network contingencies and cascading consequences. To address this challenge, a virtual‐physical power flow (VPPF) method is proposed for the vulnerability assessment of CPPS. The proposed method contains dual power flows, one is to simulate a virtual power flow from decision‐making units, and the other is to simulate a physical power flow. In addition, a novel hierarchical control model is proposed that includes four layers of CPPS: the physical layer, the secondary device layer, the regional control layer, and the national control layer. The model is based on IEEE test cases using data and structures provided by MATPOWER. Denial‐of‐service (DoS) and false data injection (FDI) are simulated as two major cyber‐attacks in CPPS. A novel vulnerability index is proposed that consists of system voltage, network latency, and node betweenness as three key indicators. This is a comprehensive and adaptive index because it encompasses both cyber and physical system characteristics and can be applied to several types of cyber‐attacks. The results of the vulnerability assessment are compared in national and regional control structures of CPPS to evaluate the vulnerability of cyber‐physical nodes.

Revealing Vulnerability of N-1 Secure Power Systems to Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks

Cascading Failures of Power System with the Consideration of Cyber Attacks.

Vulnerability Assessment of Electrical Cyber-Physical Systems Against Cyber Attacks

Analysis of Malware-Induced Cyber Attacks in Cyber-Physical Power Systems

CCPA: Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks and Countermeasures in Smart Grid.

A Game Theory-Based Approach For Vulnerability Analysis Of A Cyber-Physical Power System

Load Redistribution Attack in Optimal Power Flow with Phase Shifting Transformers

Modeling and Vulnerability Analysis of Cyber-Physical Power Systems Considering Network Topology and Power Flow Properties

Modeling an Attack-Mitigation Dynamic Game-Theoretic Scheme for Security Vulnerability Analysis in a Cyber-Physical Power System

Virtual‐physical power flow method for cyber‐physical power system contingency and vulnerability assessment

Dual nature of cyber–physical power systems and the mitigation strategies

Risk Assessment and Defense Resource Allocation of Cyber-Physical Distribution Systems under Denial-of-Service Attacks

Soft Open Points-Assisted Resilience Enhancement of Power Distribution Networks Against Cyber Risks

Multi-Objective False Data Injection Attacks of Cyber–Physical Power Systems

Vulnerability Assessment for Cyber Physical System of Distribution Network in Distributed Cooperative Control Mode

A Tri‐level Optimization Strategy Incorporating Wind Power Against Coordinated Cyber‐physical Attacks

Bilevel Model For Analyzing Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks On Power Systems

A Tri‐level Optimization Model for Power Systems Defense Considering Cyber‐physical Interdependence

Cascading Failure Analysis of Cyber Physical Power System With Multiple Interdependency and Control Threshold.

Robustness assessment of weakly coupled cyber-physical power systems under multi-stage attacks

Robust Optimal Power Flow Against Adversarial Attacks: A Tri-Level Optimization Approach