Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine whether clients’ degree of digitalization and audit firms’ expertise in information technology (IT) influence audit quality (AQ). Design/methodology/approach Data of Chinese A-share firms listed on the primary board of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2011 to 2019 are taken as the sample. All the data are obtained from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research. Clients’ digitalization is determined using the keywords “AI technology,” “blockchain,” “cloud computing,” “big data technology” and “digital technology.” Auditor firm’s digital expertise is determined by the proportion of higher IT expertise. As the proxy for AQ, this study uses audit fees, given that its quantum reflects the effort auditors expend that in turn affects the AQ. Findings A fixed-effect regression model shows that clients with high digitalization attain AQ. This study also finds a significant and positive coefficient of audit fees, indicating that AQ is high in the same situation if an audit firm’s IT is mature and developed. Furthermore, results confirm the moderating effect of clients’ digitalization and auditors’ expertise and on AQ. Auditors’ expertise in IT mitigates the audit risk and increase AQ. Originality/value Findings can enhance AQ and corporate governance literature by clarifying how external audits must evolve through digitalization and incorporating newly developed digital tools such as big data, analytics, artificial intelligence and robotic process automation. This study also provides important insights regarding how the development of new digital tools allow the audit profession to perform as a corporate governance mechanism.

Clients’ digitalization, audit firms’ digital expertise, and audit quality: evidence from China

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Does the adoption of artificial intelligence by audit firms and their clients affect audit quality and efficiency? Evidence from China

Gimmick or revolution: can corporate digital transformation improve accounting information quality?

A Study on the Relation between Client's Influence and Audit Quality from the Perspective of Individual Auditor

Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China

Effects of Artificial Intelligence in the Modern Business Client Artificial Intelligence Application and Audit Quality

Can fintech improve audit efficiency? Empirical evidence from audit fees and corporate governance

Enterprise digital transformation and audit quality: Empirical evidence from annual reports of Chinese listed companies

Enterprise Digital Investment and Auditor Choice: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Listed Enterprises

IPO-Audit Expertise, Audit Quality, and Capital Allocation Efficiency: Evidence from China

Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings

Does joining global accounting firm networks and associations affect audit quality and audit pricing? Evidence from China

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

Employee Quality and Audit Fee: Evidence from China

Quality Management System and Audit Quality: The Moderating Effect of Independent Audit Inspection in China

Is digital finance always beneficial to accounting information transparency? Evidence from China

Corporate digital washing and auditor choice: evidence from China

Is there an association between accounting firm ranks and audit quality? An examination of the top 100 accounting firms in China

Governance effects of digital transformation: from the perspective of accounting quality

The effect of CPA Firms, Audit Fee and CPA Rotation on Earnings Quality (Case Study: IT Industry in China)