A multiple x‐ray‐source array (MXA) system with a planar two‐dimensional source distribution for digital breast tomosynthesis
Alejandro Sisniega,Andrew M. Hernandez,Shadi A. Shakeri,Elizabeth A. Morris,John M. Boone,Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,Paul R. Schwoebel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17452
IF: 4.506
2024-10-11
Medical Physics
Abstract:Background Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has outpaced digital mammography in clinical adoption in the United States; however, substantial technological limitations remain to image quality in DBT, including undersampling from a one‐dimensional (1D) scan geometry, x‐ray source motion during acquisition, and patient motion artifacts from long exam times. Purpose A thermionic cathode x‐ray system employing two‐dimensional (2D, planar) multiple x‐ray‐source arrays (MXA) is proposed to improve DBT image quality. Methods A 1D MXA, consisting of a linear array of thermionic cathodes was used to simulate a 2D MXA. The 1D MXA included 11 focal spots separated by a distance of Δd = 23 mm. The 11 cathodes were paired with 11 molybdenum 50 mm diameter anode disks, mounted on a rotating shaft within a single vacuum enclosure. Image quality was investigated as a function of MXA configuration by integrating the 1D MXA with a 200 × 250 mm2 flat panel detector at a source‐to‐detector distance of 630 mm, resulting in a 20° tomographic arc. To simulate a 2D MXA, the detector (with phantom) was translated orthogonally to the linear array by a distance (δ ) ranging from δ = 0 mm (conventional 1D) to δ = 57 mm. All sources operated at 30 kV with 80 mA and 4.5 mAs/pulse, yielding ∼100 mAs per DBT dataset. DBT reconstructions involved 22 projections and used filtered backprojection with a ramp and Hann apodization filter. Volumetric reconstructions for each source were weighted by sampling differences between sources, and averaged. Image quality was assessed in terms of contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), background clutter noise and power spectrum, and slice sensitivity profile (SSP) using a set of physical phantoms, including: (i) contrast‐detail signals coupled to spherical clutter (PMMA in air); (ii) an SSP phantom; (iii) a commercial "breast" phantom (CIRS BR3D, Sun Nuclear, Norfolk, VA); and (iv) bovine muscle. Results Background clutter noise amplitude reduced monotonically from the 1D MXA (σclutter = 5.9 A.U., δ = 0 mm) and 2D MXA arrays with increasing δ , with statistical significance between the 1D MXA and 2D MXA with δ = 57 mm (σclutter = 5.0 A.U., p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging