Effect of Two Types of Iron Mmts on the Flame Retardation of Ldpe Composite

Cong Deng,Jing Zhao,Cheng-Liang Deng,Qiang Lv,Li Chen,Yu-Zhong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.001
IF: 5.204
2014-01-01
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Abstract:Both MMT synthesized by hydrothermal method (Fe-OMMT) and MMT prepared by modifying MMT using Fe3+ (Fe-MMT) were used to prepare flame-retardant low-density polyethylene (FR-LOPE) together with an intumescent flame retardant (IFR). The effects of two types of MMTs on the flame retardation of FR-LOPE were investigated by different measurements. Combustion tests showed that the limiting oxygen index (LOI) of LDPE/IFR28/Fe-MMT2 was increased to 34.6 from 29 of LDPE/IFR30, and the UL-94 rating of the former reached V-2 from no rating of the latter. Cone calorimeter (CC) test demonstrated that both Fe-OMMT and Fe-MMT improved the combustion behaviors of LDPE/IFR at about 2 wt%. LDPE/ IFR/Fe-MMT had a lower heat release rate (HRR), lower total heat release (THR) and more residues than LDPE/IFR/Fe-OMMT at the same loading in the range from 0.5 to 3 wt%. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation showed that both Fe-MMT and Fe-OMMT could promote the formation of continuous and compact intumescent char layer in LDPE/IFR. Both CC and UL-94 tests vitrified that Fe-MMT had better contribution to IFR in fire resistance test. Thermogravimatric (TG) and Mossbauer spectrum etc. revealed that the different efficiency of Fe-OMMT and Fe-MMT should mainly be resulting from the structure difference between Fe-MMT and Fe-OMMT, in which the essential difference might be the different existing state of Fe in two types of MMTs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?