Thermodynamics of Nanocrystalline Sn0.586Ti0.414O2 Rutile Solid Solution: Comparison with Nanocrystalline SnO2 and TiO2 and with Bulk Materials

Yuanyuan Ma,Alexandra Navrotsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05336.x
IF: 4.186
2012-01-01
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Abstract:Nanocrystalline Sn x Ti 1−x O 2 rutile solid solutions are important materials for a variety of gas sensors and catalysts. Although thermodynamic data are available for nanocrystalline SnO 2 and TiO 2 and for bulk (coarse‐grained) Sn x Ti 1−x O 2 solid solutions, there is a lack of experimental thermochemical data on the energetics of Sn x Ti 1−x O 2 nanoparticles. In this work, Sn 0.586 Ti 0.414 O 2 rutile solid solution nanoparticles were synthesized. The surface energies of anhydrous and hydrated nanoparticles were measured by combining high‐temperature oxide melt solution calorimetry molten 2PbO·B2O3 at 800°C and water adsorption calorimetry. The surface energy of the anhydrous surface is 2.02 ± 0.03 J·m−2, and that of the hydrated surface is 1.68 ± 0.03 J·m−2. These values lie between the previously reported surface energies of rutile SnO2 and TiO2. The integral heat of water adsorption is −80 kJ·mol−1, with a chemisorbed maximum coverage of ~6 H2O·nm−2. These values are also between those for TiO2 and SnO2 (rutile) reported previously. The strongly positive (unfavorable) energetics of mixing in SnO2–TiO2 bulk solid solutions are predicted to change little at the nanoscale, and the extensive solid solution seen in the nanophase system prepared near room temperature reflects kinetic hindrance to exsolution of an initially homogeneous precipitate rather than thermodynamic stability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?