Abstract:The first countervailing duty law dates from the late nineteenth century when the US enacted a law to address sugar subsidies provided by Russia. Canada enacted the first anti-dumping law in 1904, and the US introduced the right to use safeguard measures in the US-Mexico reciprocal trade agreement of 1942. In the late 1940s, these trade remedies were included in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Before 1995, however, their use was mainly limited to developed countries at the forefront of trade liberalization. Before the Uruguay Round, many countries had made only limited tariff bindings and had little need for trade remedies to address import problems. Since the Uruguay Round, which established the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 and required all Members to bind the vast majority of their tariff lines, many more countries have found trade remedies to be a necessary tool to address import problems. Over the first eighteen years of the WTO's existence, the number of users of trade remedies (antidumping, countervailing duty, and safeguard actions) has increased and these measures are now used by both the traditional users of such remedies (e.g., US, EU, Canada, Australia) and by new users (e.g., India, Argentina, Brazil, China, Turkey, Egypt). Some ask whether the use of the internationally negotiated trade remedy tools within the WTO by a wide range of countries (both old and new users) is a cause of concern or a positive sign. In the author's view, the increased use of trade remedies within the WTO is a positive sign for the global trading system, and not a cause for concern. Resort to trade remedies is not a sign of protectionism but an integral part of the trading system which can help Member nations expand their trade liberalization. However, the WTO needs to be concerned about the abuse of trade remedies by WTO Members who appear to have used trade remedies as a form of retaliation against trading partners pursuing their WTO rights.

China’s Preferential Trade Remedy Approaches: A New Haven School Perspective

China, Regional Trade Agreements and Wto Law

Promising Trail or Perilous Trap? Engaging China in the WTO and Beyond

China'S Experience in Dealing with Wto Dispute Settlement: A Chinese Perspective

Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?

Understanding China'S Recent Active Moves on Wto Litigation: Rising Legalism And/Or Reluctant Response?

China’s Path to the Center Stage of WTO Dispute Settlement: Challenges and Responses

China's Intra-product Trade: Status Quo Problems and Countermeasures

Chinese women after the accession to the world trade organization: A legal perspective on women's labor rights

The EUs New FTA Adventures and Their Implications for China

Cross-border higher education in China in the globalized world: The perspective of the World Trade Organization's General Agreement on Trade in Services

China's Ten Years in the WTO: Review and Perspectives

China and WTO: Retrospect and Prospect in Perspective of Globalization

The Issue of Non-market Economy Status in China’s Anti-dumping Investigations Against Imports: A Development for the Implementation of New Rules or A Balancing Strategy?

Comparative Studies on Dispute Settlement Systems in Regional Trade Agreements and Analysis on Contrast of Effectiveness

On the Market Disruption and the Abuse of the Transitional Product-Specific Safeguard Measures Against China

WILL CHINA REDEFINE INTERNATIONAL TRADE NORMS?

China´s Bilateral Free Trade Agreements As Strategic Alignments: Building of a Comprehensive Cooperation Network with Pragmatic Countries of the Latin American Pacific Rim

China’s Perspective on Applying for the CPTPP: Enhancing Economic Interdependence As a Hedging Approach in Great Power Rivalry

Where is the Balance? Implications of Adopting Special Products and Sensitive Products in Doha Negotiations for World and China's Agriculture

China’s Concerns on the Core Issues of Digital Trade