Estimating the common break date in large factor models

liang chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.03.037

IF: 1.469

2015-01-01

Economics Letters

Abstract:This paper considers large dimensional factor models with structural breaks in the factor loadings at a common date. A consistent estimator for the break date is proposed. Simulation results confirm its good performance for small and moderate sample sizes.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Estimation of Large Dimensional Factor Models with an Unknown Number of Breaks

Shujie Ma,Liangjun Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.06.019

IF: 3.363

2018-01-01

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:In this paper we study the estimation of a large dimensional factor model when the factor loadings exhibit an unknown number of changes over time. We propose a novel three-step procedure to detect the breaks if any and then identify their locations. In the first step, we divide the whole time span into subintervals and fit a conventional factor model on each interval. In the second step, we apply the adaptive fused group Lasso to identify intervals containing a break. In the third step, we devise a grid search method to estimate the location of the break on each identified interval. We show that with probability approaching one our method can identify the correct number of changes and estimate the break locations. Simulation studies indicate superb finite sample performance of our method. We apply our method to investigate Stock and Watson’s (2009) U.S. monthly macroeconomic dataset and identify five breaks in the factor loadings, spanning 1959–2006.
Detecting Big Structural Breaks in Large Factor Models

Liang Chen,Juan J. Dolado,Jesus Gonzalo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.01.006

IF: 3.363

2014-01-01

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:Time invariance of factor loadings is a standard assumption in the analysis of large factor models. Yet, this assumption may be restrictive unless parameter shifts are mild (i.e., local to zero). In this paper we develop a new testing procedure to detect big breaks in these loadings at either known or unknown dates. It relies upon testing for parameter breaks in a regression of one of the factors estimated by Principal Components analysis on the remaining estimated factors, where the number of factors is chosen according to Bai and Ng’s (2002) information criteria. The test fares well in terms of power relative to other recently proposed tests on this issue, and can be easily implemented to avoid forecasting failures in standard factor-augmented (FAR, FAVAR) models where the number of factors is a priori imposed on the basis of theoretical considerations.
Group Fused Lasso for Large Factor Models with Multiple Structural Breaks

Chenchen Ma,Yundong Tu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.02.003

IF: 3.363

2023-01-01

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:This paper reformulates the identification of multiple structural breaks in factor loadings as a problem of detecting structural breaks in a factor regression, where the estimated pseudo factor corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is regressed on the remaining estimated factors. As a result, a group fused Lasso based estimation procedure is proposed to identify the break dates. Our procedure is practically easy-to-implement with standard statistical packages, overcoming the drawbacks of the existing methods that they often involve multiple tuning parameters and are computationally demanding in dealing with multiple unknown breaks. Theoretical properties of the proposed estimators are established, with a data driven choice of tuning parameter in the procedure. The Monte Carlo simulations and a real data application demonstrate that our procedure is fast implementable with desirable accuracy performance, and thus enjoys practical merits.
Estimating and Testing for Multiple Distributional Structural Breaks Via a Characteristic Function Approach

Zhonghao Fu,Yongmiao Hong,Xia Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3559941

2020-01-01

Abstract:We estimate and test for multiple structural breaks in distribution with unknown break dates via a characteristic function approach. By minimizing the sum of squared generalized residuals, we can consistently estimate the break fractions. We propose a sup-F type test for structural breaks in distribution and suggest an information criterion and a sequential testing procedure to determine the number of breaks. We further construct a class of derivative tests to gauge the possible source of structural breaks, which is asymptotically more powerful than the nonparametric-based tests for structural breaks. Simulation studies show that our method performs well in determining the appropriate number of breaks and estimating the unknown breaks. Furthermore, the proposed tests have reasonable size and excellent power. In an application to exchange rate returns, our tests are able to detect structural breaks in distribution and locate the break dates. Our derivate tests indicate that the documented breaks appear to occur in variance and higher order moments, but not so often in mean.
Dynamic Semiparametric Factor Model With Structural Breaks

Likai Chen,Weining Wang,Wei Biao Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2020.1730857

2020-03-19

Journal of Business and Economic Statistics

Abstract:For the change-point analysis of a high-dimensional time series, we consider a semiparametric model with dynamic structural break factors. With our model, the observations are described by a few low-dimensional factors with time-invariant loading functions of the covariates. Regarding the structural break, the factors are assumed to be nonstationary and follow a vector autoregression process with a change in the parameter values. In addition, to account for the known spatial discrepancies, we introduce discrete loading functions. We study the theoretical properties of the estimates of the loading functions and the factors. Moreover, we provide both the consistency and the asymptotic normality for making an inference on the estimated breakpoint. Importantly, our results hold for both large and small breaks in the factor dependency structure. The estimation precision is further illustrated via a simulation study. Finally, we present two empirical applications in modeling the dynamics of the minimum wage policy in China and analyzing a limit order book dataset. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

statistics & probability,social sciences, mathematical methods,economics
Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of break point in high-dimensional factor models

Jiangtao Duan,Jushan Bai,Xu Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.12.011

IF: 3.363

2022-03-01

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:This paper proposes a quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) estimator of the break point for large-dimensional factor models with a single structural break in the factor loading matrix. We show that the QML estimator is consistent for the true break point when the covariance matrix of the pre- or post-break factor loading (or both) is singular. Consistency here means that the deviation of the estimated break date from the true break date k0 converges to zero as the sample size grows. This is a much stronger result than the break fraction kˆ/T being T-consistent (super-consistent) for k0/T. Also, singularity occurs for most types of structural changes, except for a rotational change. Even for a rotational change, the QML estimator is still T-consistent in terms of the break fraction. Simulation results confirm the theoretical properties of our estimator, and it significantly outperforms existing estimators for change points in factor models.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
ON MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN DISTRIBUTION: AN EMPIRICAL CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION APPROACH

Zhonghao Fu,Yongmiao Hong,Xia Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646662200010x

IF: 1.968

2022-01-01

Econometric Theory

Abstract:We estimate and test for multiple structural breaks in distribution via an empirical characteristic function approach. By minimizing the sum of squared generalized residuals, we can consistently estimate the break fractions. We propose a sup-F type test for structural breaks in distribution as well as an information criterion and a sequential testing procedure to determine the number of breaks. We further construct a class of derivative tests to gauge possible sources of structural breaks, which is asymptotically more powerful than the smoothed nonparametric tests for structural breaks. Simulation studies show that our method performs well in determining the appropriate number of breaks and estimating the unknown breaks. Furthermore, the proposed tests have reasonable size and excellent power in finite samples. In an application to exchange rate returns, our tests are able to detect structural breaks in distribution and locate the break dates. Our tests also indicate that the documented breaks appear to occur in variance and higher-order moments, but not so often in mean.
Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects and Multiple Structural Breaks

Degui Li,Junhui Qian,Liangjun Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1119696

2015-01-01

Abstract:In this article, we consider estimation of common structural breaks in panel data models with unobservable interactive fixed effects. We introduce a penalized principal component (PPC) estimation procedure with an adaptive group fused LASSO to detect the multiple structural breaks in the models. Under some mild conditions, we show that with probability approaching one the proposed method can correctly determine the unknown number of breaks and consistently estimate the common break dates. Furthermore, we estimate the regression coefficients through the post-LASSO method and establish the asymptotic distribution theory for the resulting estimators. The developed methodology and theory are applicable to the case of dynamic panel data models. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method works well in finite samples with low false detection probability when there is no structural break and high probability of correctly estimating the break numbers when the structural breaks exist. We finally apply our method to study the environmental Kuznets curve for 74 countries over 40 years and detect two breaks in the data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Factor Selection and Structural Breaks

Siddhartha Chib,Simon Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4796413

2024-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We develop a new approach to select factors, allowing the set to change at multiple unknown break dates. In a six-factor model since 1963, we document a marked shift towards parsimonious models in the last two decades. Prior to 2005, either five or six factors are selected, but just two are selected thereafter. This finding offers a simple implication for the factor zoo literature: ignoring breaks detects additional factors that are no longer relevant. Moreover, all omitted factors are priced by the selected factors in every regime. Finally, the selected factors outperform popular factor models as an investment strategy.
Estimating a common break point in means for long‐range dependent panel data

Daiqing Xi,Cheng‐Der Fuh,Tianxiao Pang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12763

2024-07-20

Journal of Time Series Analysis

Abstract:In this article, we study a common break point in means for panel data with cross‐sectional dependence through unobservable common factors, in which the observations are long‐range dependent over time and are heteroscedastic and may have different degrees of dependence across panels. First, we adopt the least squares method without taking the data features into account to estimate the common break point and to see how the data features affect the asymptotic behaviors of the estimator. Then, an iterative least squares estimator of the common break point which accounts for the common factors in the estimation procedure is examined. Our theoretical results reveal that: (1) There is a trade‐off between the overall break magnitude of the panel data and the long‐range dependence for both estimators. (2) The second estimation procedure can eliminate the effects of common factors from the asymptotic behaviors of the estimator successfully, but it cannot improve the rate of convergence of the estimator in most cases. Moreover, Monte Carlo simulations are given to illustrate the theoretical results on finite‐sample performance.

statistics & probability,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
A Bayesian Method of Change-Point Estimation with Recurrent Regimes: Application to GARCH Models

Luc Bauwens,Bruno De Backer,Arnaud Dufays

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2965494

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We present an estimation and forecasting method, based on a differential evolution MCMC method, for inference in GARCH models subjected to an unknown number of structural breaks at unknown dates. We treat break dates as parameters and determine the number of breaks by computing the marginal likelihoods of competing models. We allow for both recurrent and non-recurrent (change-point) regime specifications. We illustrate the estimation method through simulations and apply it to seven financial time series of daily returns. We find structural breaks in the volatility dynamics of all series and recurrent regimes in nearly all series. Finally, we carry out a forecasting exercise to evaluate the usefulness of structural break models.
A Robust Residual-Based Test for Structural Changes in Factor Models

Bin Peng,Liangjun Su,Yayi Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.00941

2024-06-03

Abstract:In this paper, we propose an easy-to-implement residual-based specification testing procedure for detecting structural changes in factor models, which is powerful against both smooth and abrupt structural changes with unknown break dates. The proposed test is robust against the over-specified number of factors, and serially and cross-sectionally correlated error processes. A new central limit theorem is given for the quadratic forms of panel data with dependence over both dimensions, thereby filling a gap in the literature. We establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed test statistic, and accordingly develop a simulation-based scheme to select critical value in order to improve finite sample performance. Through extensive simulations and a real-world application, we confirm our theoretical results and demonstrate that the proposed test exhibits desirable size and power in practice.

Econometrics
Noncommon Breaks

Simon C. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2024.2301969

2024-02-01

Journal of Business and Economic Statistics

Abstract:We develop a new Bayesian approach to estimate noncommon structural breaks in panel regression models. Any subset of the cross-section may be hit at different times within a break window. Break-specific parameters are learned from the cross-section. They reflect whether (i) breaks hit many or few series and (ii) there is a long or short lag between the first and final series hit by a break. In an empirical application to international stock return predictability, the method generates significantly more accurate forecasts than several benchmarks that yield economically meaningful utility gains for a risk averse investor with power utility.

statistics & probability,social sciences, mathematical methods,economics
The likelihood ratio test for structural changes in factor models

Jushan Bai,Jiangtao Duan,Xu Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105631

IF: 3.363

2024-01-04

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:A factor model with a break in its factor loadings is observationally equivalent to a model without changes in the loadings but with a change in the variance of its factors. This approach effectively transforms a high-dimensional structural change problem into a low-dimensional problem. This paper considers the likelihood ratio (LR) test for a variance change in the estimated factors. The LR test implicitly explores a special feature of the estimated factors: the pre-break and post-break variances can be a singular matrix under the alternative hypothesis, making the LR test diverging faster and thus more powerful than Wald-type tests. The better power property of the LR test is also confirmed by simulations. We also consider mean changes and multiple breaks. We apply this procedure to the factor modeling of the US employment and study the structural change problem using monthly industry-level data.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
Disentangling Structural Breaks in Factor Models for Macroeconomic Data

Bonsoo Koo,Benjamin Wong,Ze-Yu Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.00178

2024-06-04

Abstract:Through a routine normalization of the factor variance, standard methods for estimating factor models in macroeconomics do not distinguish between breaks of the factor variance and factor loadings. We argue that it is important to distinguish between structural breaks in the factor variance and loadings within factor models commonly employed in macroeconomics as both can lead to markedly different interpretations when viewed via the lens of the underlying dynamic factor model. We then develop a projection-based decomposition that leads to two standard and easy-to-implement Wald tests to disentangle structural breaks in the factor variance and factor loadings. Applying our procedure to U.S. macroeconomic data, we find evidence of both types of breaks associated with the Great Moderation and the Great Recession. Through our projection-based decomposition, we estimate that the Great Moderation is associated with an over 60% reduction in the total factor variance, highlighting the relevance of disentangling breaks in the factor structure.

Methodology,Econometrics
Structural Changes in High Dimensional Factor Models

Xu Han,Jushan Bai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3868/S060-005-016-0003-9

2016-03-22

Abstract:This paper provides a survey on recent developments in structural changes for high dimensional factor models. Compared with conventional low-dimensional time series, structural changes in factor models are more complicated due to the unobservability of factors and factor loadings. The following topics are covered in this survey: the identification conditions for the structural changes in the factor loadings, different impacts of big and small breaks in factor models, tests for structural changes in the factor loadings of a specific variable, tests for structural changes in the factor loading matrix, joint tests for structural changes in the factor loadings and coefficients in factor-augmented regressions, tests for smooth changes in the factor loadings, estimation of break dates, and model selection in factor models with structural changes via the shrinkage method.

Physics,Economics
Estimating and Testing High Dimensional Factor Models With Multiple Structural Changes

Badi H. Baltagi,Fa Wang,Chihwa D. Kao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3531662

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper considers multiple changes in the factor loadings of a high dimensional factor model occurring at dates that are unknown but common to all subjects. Since the factors are unobservable, the problem is converted to estimating and testing structural changes in the second moments of the pseudo factors. We consider both joint and sequential estimation of the change points and show that the distance between the estimated and the true change points is Op(1). We find that the estimation error contained in the estimated pseudo factors has no effect on the asymptotic properties of the estimated change points as the cross-sectional dimension N and the time dimension T go to infinity jointly. No N-T ratio condition is needed. We also propose (i) tests for the null of no change versus the alternative of l changes (ii) tests for the null of l changes versus the alternative of l + 1 changes, and show that using estimated factors asymptotically has no effect on their limit distributions if √T/N→0. These tests allow us to make inference on the presence and number of structural changes. Simulation results show good performance of the proposed procedure. In an application to US quarterly macroeconomic data we detect two possible breaks.
How to Distinguish Abrupt Structural Breaks from Smooth Structural Changes

Yuying Sun,Yongmiao Hong,Shouyang Wang

2018-01-01

Abstract:Structural changes often occur in economics and finance due to changes in preferences, technologies, institutional reforms, policies, crises and other factors. It is important to distinguish whether a structural change is abrupt or evolutionary, because the implications on econometric modelling and inferences will be different. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric consistent test for the null hypothesis of smooth structural changes against the alternative hypothesis of at least an abrupt structural break. The basic idea is to check whether smoothed nonparametric estimators for the left and right limits of time-varying parameters in a linear regression model converge to the same limit at every time point in the sample period. We avoid making any restrictive assumption on a parametric functional form for time-varying parameters, and allow to use data-driven time-varying bandwidths in nonparametric estimation. We derive the asymptotic nonstandard null distribution of a test based on the maximal difference between the left and right limit estimators and establish the consistency of the test under the alternative. A Hansen’s-type (1996) resampling method is used to compute the p-value of the test statistic. Our simulation study highlights the merits of the proposed test. In an empirical application, we find strong evidence in favor of existence of abrupt structural breaks for most predictive regressions of equity returns, and the dates of these structural breaks are closely related to important historical macroeconomic events and policy changes.
TESTING FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN FACTOR MODELS VIA A NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION

Liangjun Su,Xia Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466619000446

IF: 1.968

2020-05-12

Econometric Theory

Abstract:We propose a model-free test for structural changes in factor models. The basic idea is to regress the data on commonly estimated factors by local smoothing and compare the fitted values of time-varying factor loadings with those of time-invariant factor loadings estimated via principal component analysis. By construction, the test is designed to be powerful against both smooth structural changes and sudden structural breaks with a possibly unknown number of breaks and unknown break dates in the factor loadings. No restrictions on the form of alternatives or trimming of boundary regions near the beginning or end of the sample period is required for the test. The test has power to detect the usual nonparametric rate of local alternatives. Monte Carlo studies demonstrate excellent power of the test in detecting both smooth and sudden structural changes in the factor loadings. In an application using U.S. asset returns, we find significant evidence against time-invariant factor loadings.

Economics,Mathematics
On Time-Varying Factor Models: Estimation and Testing

Liangjun Su,Xia Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.12.004

IF: 3.363

2017-01-01

Journal of Econometrics

Abstract:Conventional factor models assume that factor loadings are fixed over a long horizon of time, which appears overly restrictive and unrealistic in applications. In this paper, we introduce a time-varying factor model where factor loadings are allowed to change smoothly over time. We propose a local version of the principal component method to estimate the latent factors and time-varying factor loadings simultaneously. We establish the limiting distributions and uniform convergence of the estimated factors and factor loadings in the standard large N and large T framework. We also propose a BIC-type information criterion to determine the number of factors, which can be used in models with either time-varying or time-invariant factor models. Based on the comparison between the estimates of the common components under the null hypothesis of no structural changes and those under the alternative, we propose a consistent test for structural changes in factor loadings. We establish the null distribution, the asymptotic local power property, and the consistency of our test. Simulations are conducted to evaluate both our nonparametric estimates and test statistic. We also apply our test to investigate Stock and Watson’s (2009) U.S. macroeconomic data set and find strong evidence of structural changes in the factor loadings.

Estimating the common break date in large factor models

Estimation of Large Dimensional Factor Models with an Unknown Number of Breaks

Detecting Big Structural Breaks in Large Factor Models

Group Fused Lasso for Large Factor Models with Multiple Structural Breaks

Estimating and Testing for Multiple Distributional Structural Breaks Via a Characteristic Function Approach

Dynamic Semiparametric Factor Model With Structural Breaks

Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of break point in high-dimensional factor models

ON MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN DISTRIBUTION: AN EMPIRICAL CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION APPROACH

Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects and Multiple Structural Breaks

Factor Selection and Structural Breaks

Estimating a common break point in means for long‐range dependent panel data

A Bayesian Method of Change-Point Estimation with Recurrent Regimes: Application to GARCH Models

A Robust Residual-Based Test for Structural Changes in Factor Models

Noncommon Breaks

The likelihood ratio test for structural changes in factor models

Disentangling Structural Breaks in Factor Models for Macroeconomic Data

Structural Changes in High Dimensional Factor Models

Estimating and Testing High Dimensional Factor Models With Multiple Structural Changes

How to Distinguish Abrupt Structural Breaks from Smooth Structural Changes

TESTING FOR STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN FACTOR MODELS VIA A NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION

On Time-Varying Factor Models: Estimation and Testing