Abstract:In this paper, we propose an easy-to-implement residual-based specification testing procedure for detecting structural changes in factor models, which is powerful against both smooth and abrupt structural changes with unknown break dates. The proposed test is robust against the over-specified number of factors, and serially and cross-sectionally correlated error processes. A new central limit theorem is given for the quadratic forms of panel data with dependence over both dimensions, thereby filling a gap in the literature. We establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed test statistic, and accordingly develop a simulation-based scheme to select critical value in order to improve finite sample performance. Through extensive simulations and a real-world application, we confirm our theoretical results and demonstrate that the proposed test exhibits desirable size and power in practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve
This paper aims to propose a new residual-based test method for detecting structural changes in factor models. Specifically, this method can effectively detect both smooth and abrupt structural changes and remains robust even when the number of factors is overestimated. Additionally, this method can handle error processes that are both serially and cross-sectionally correlated.
### Background and Motivation
With the advent of the big data era, factor models have become very popular over the past 30 years. An important feature of these models is the low-rank representation, meaning that high-dimensional observed data can be driven by a series of low-dimensional vectors. However, economists have realized that the relationships between economic and financial variables may change over time, and thus factor loadings (which reflect the relationships between these variables and the latent factors) may also change over time or with certain state variables.
### Limitations of Existing Methods
Existing methods for detecting structural changes in factor models can be mainly divided into two categories:
1. **Abrupt Change Detection**: Methods such as Breitung and Eickmeier (2011), Han and Inoue (2015), etc., which usually can only detect local alternative hypotheses converging to the null hypothesis at a slower rate (e.g., \( T^{-1/2} \)).
2. **Smooth Change Detection**: Methods such as Su and Wang (2017), Fu et al. (2023), etc., which can detect smooth changes but usually require the assumption that error terms are independent across both cross-sectional and time dimensions.
### Main Contributions of the Paper
1. **Asymptotic Distribution**: Assuming the number of factors is correctly specified, the authors establish the asymptotic distribution of the residual-based test statistic under the null hypothesis, allowing for dependencies in error terms across both cross-sectional and time dimensions. To this end, the authors provide a new central limit theorem, filling a gap in the literature.
2. **Overestimation of Factor Numbers**: The authors extend their study to show that even if the number of factors is overestimated, the limiting null distribution of the test statistic still holds. This is crucial in practical applications as users only need to specify a sufficiently large fixed value without precisely identifying the number of factors.
3. **Local Power**: The authors explore the local power of the proposed test statistic, showing that it can detect local alternative hypotheses converging to the null hypothesis at a rate of \( (NT)^{-1/2}h^{-1/4} \), which is faster than most existing methods.
4. **Global Power**: The authors also study the global power behavior of the test statistic, explaining the power source of LM-type tests.
5. **Numerical Studies**: Through extensive numerical simulations and real data applications, the theoretical results are validated, demonstrating the excellent performance of the proposed test in practical applications.
### Conclusion
This paper proposes a new residual-based test method that can effectively detect structural changes in factor models and remains robust even when the number of factors is overestimated. The method performs well in handling error processes that are both serially and cross-sectionally correlated, and it exhibits high local and global power.