Terrestrial CO2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies
Xiaolan Li,Xiao-Ming Hu,Changjie Cai,Qingyu Jia,Yao Zhang,Jingmiao Liu,Ming Xue,Jianming Xu,Rihong Wen,Sean M. R. Crowell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031686
2020-01-01
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Abstract:CO2 fluxes and concentrations are not well understood in Northeast China, where dominant land surface types are mixed forest and cropland. Here, we analyzed the CO2 fluxes and concentrations using Eddy Covariance (EC) measurements, satellite observations, and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with the Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (WRF-VPRM). We also used WRF-VPRM outputs to examine CO2 transport/dispersion, and to quantify the biogenic and anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Finally, we investigated the uncertainties of simulating CO2 fluxes related to four VPRM parameters (including maximum light use efficiency, photosynthetically active radiation half-saturation value, and two respiration parameters) using offline ensemble simulations with randomly selected parameter values. The results indicated that mixed forests acted as a larger CO2 source and sink than rice paddies on average in 2016 due to a longer growth period and stronger ecosystem respiration, although the minimum EC-measured daily mean net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was smaller at rice paddy (-10 μmol m-2 s-1) than at mixed forest (-6.5 μmol m-2 s-1) during the growing season (May through September). The monthly fluctuation of column-averaged CO2 concentrations (XCO2) exceeded 10 ppm in Northeast China during 2016. Biogenic contribution (large negative in summer and insignificant in other months) offset about 70% of anthropogenic contribution of XCO2 in this region. WRF-VPRM modeling successfully captured seasonal and episodic variations of NEE and CO2 concentrations, however, the NEE in mixed forest was overestimated during daytime, mainly due to the uncertainties of VPRM parameters, especially maximum light use efficiency.