Abstract:Organic objects of bone,antler,and ivory etc.widely appeared in the Upper Paleolithic,and serve as signals of behavioral innovation of modern humans.Bone and antler tools which were elegantly and intensively produced through complextechnological sequence,were used for various tasks and the intensive exploitation of resources.Bone and antler tools,together with other innovations in the Upper Paleolithic expands human’s niche and facilitates modern human adaptation in northern Eurasia.This paper provides a brief review on the study of the bone and antler tools in the Upper Paleolithic of southwestern Germany.Our observations show that animal bones and antlers were often carefully selected for making tools.The availability of raw material significantly depends on the animal resources that foragers were able to hunt and acquire.Besides this the physical properties including the structure of bone and antler can affect the easiness and efficiency of manufacture,as well as the effectiveness and duration of the tool.The techniques of opening bones and making blank for tool production could be varied depending on the original shape of the bone.Nevertheless,grooving-splintering technique plays a key role in making standardized and well-shaped blanks or preforms of bone and antler,and it allows further shaping and modification easier and efficient.The bone and antler tool industry in the context of Chinese and European Upper Paleolithic shows similar technological concept and operation,as well as tool type.However,the Chinese records of bone and antler tools are scarce,and the wedging and splintering or grooving-splintering techniques have rarely been identified.Finally,we have a discussion about what might be responsible for the ‘difference’ in bone and antler tool production in China,and proposed the direction for future work.

Early Polished Stone Tools in South China Evidence of the Transition from Palaeolithic to Neolithic

The paleolithic site of Longwangchan in the middle Yellow River, China: chronology, paleoenvironment and implications

The Chinese Upper Paleolithic: Geography, Chronology, and Techno-typology

Paleolithic Archaeology in China

Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago

Longquan Cave: an Early Upper Palaeolithic Site in Henan Province, China

Late Middle Pleistocene Levallois stone-tool technology in southwest China

New evidence and perspectives on the Upper Paleolithic of the Central Plain in China

A Functional Study of Ground Stone Tools from the Bronze Age Site of Dingjiacun in South China: Based on Use-Wear Evidence

Continuous technological and behavioral development of late Pleistocene hominins in central South China: Multidisciplinary analysis at Sandinggai

Lithic technologies at Guanyindong cave, Southwest China: diversity and innovation during the Chinese Middle Palaeolithic

An Experimental Investigation of the Ground Stone Knives and Sickles in the Lower Yangtze River Region During the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age

Research on Stone Artifacts Unearthed in 1998 from the Beiyao Loessic Paleolithic Site,Luoyang City

Lithic Technological Strategies of Late Pleistocene Hominins in the Daoshui River Valley, Hunan Province, Central South China

The Emergence of Early Microblade Technology in the Hinterland of North China: a Case Study Based on the Xishi and Dongshi Site in Henan Province

Late Pleistocene Human Migrations in China

The Emergence of Pottery in China: Recent Dating of Two Early Pottery Cave Sites in South China

Use-wear analysis of the stone tools from the Jiahu site in Wuyang county, Henan province

Bone and Antler Tools in the Upper Paleolithic of Germany

Commentary on Foreign Research of Polished Stone Axes and Adzes

Regional Variation in the Shift Towards Microlithization: the Development of Early Microblade Technology in North China