Abstract:Abstract Archaeological assemblages labeled as Initial Upper Paleolithic are often seen as possible evidence for dispersals of Homo sapiens populations in Eurasia, ca. 45,000 years ago. While most authors agree that the IUP can be recognized by a set of shared features, there is far less consensus on what these features are, and what they mean. Because of methodological challenges inherent to long distance comparisons, documenting and establishing a firm connection between archaeological assemblages remain difficult and often draw legitimate skepticism. There could be many reasons why Paleolithic hunter-gatherers used comparable technologies, but it usually comes down to two kinds of processes: cultural transmission or convergence. In other words, technological similarities may illustrate a cultural link between regions or may be caused by mechanisms of independent reinvention between more distantly related populations. Here, I focus on three assemblages from the Siberian Altai, Zabaikal region, and North Mongolia to address one main question: is there such thing as a united IUP in Central and East Asia, or are we looking at unrelated yet comparable adaptive processes? First, I describe the common structure of lithic blade production at the sites, with special attention to derived features relative to the regional sequence. After comparing the complexity of the production system with those of other lithic technologies, I suggest that this coherent, intricate, yet unprecedented technological pattern found across contiguous regions in Asia is better explained by transmission processes than by multiple unrelated reinventions, or local developments. The blade production system described in Siberia and Mongolia reoccur as a package, which is consistent with indirect bias and/or conformist cultural transmission processes. Overall, the results point toward close contact between individuals and hunter gatherer populations, and supports the recognition of a broad cultural unit to encapsulate Asian IUP assemblages. Considering other lines of evidence, the geographical and chronological distribution of Asian IUP lithic technology is consistent with a dispersal of Homo sapiens populations in Central and East Asia during the Marine Isotopic Stage 3, although the geographical origin of such movement is less clear.

Regional Variation in the Shift Towards Microlithization: the Development of Early Microblade Technology in North China

The Emergence of Early Microblade Technology in the Hinterland of North China: a Case Study Based on the Xishi and Dongshi Site in Henan Province

Diachronic Shifts in Lithic Technological Transmission Between the Eastern Eurasian Steppe and Northern China in the Late Pleistocene.

Chronology of the Youfang site and its implications for the emergence of microblade technology in North China

Environmental Reconstruction and Dating of Shizitan 29, Shanxi Province: an Early Microblade Site in North China

The paleolithic site of Longwangchan in the middle Yellow River, China: chronology, paleoenvironment and implications

A Consideration of the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Microblade Industries on the Tibetan Plateau

Analyzing blank cutting edge efficiency associated with the adoption of microblade technology: A case study from Tolbor-17, Mongolia

New Ages for the Upper Palaeolithic Site of Xibaimaying in the Nihewan Basin, Northern China: Implications for Small-Tool and Microblade Industries in North-East Asia During Marine Isotope Stages 2 and 3

The Chinese Upper Paleolithic: Geography, Chronology, and Techno-typology

The Function and Flexible Use of a Neolithic Microlithic Assemblage from the Huihe Dam Site, Inner Mongolia: a Quantifiable Analysis of Use-Wear Evidence

New evidence and perspectives on the Upper Paleolithic of the Central Plain in China

Microwear Analysis of a Bone-Handled Microblade Excavated at Shangzhai Site in Beijing: Evidences from ESEM

A Macroscopic Perspective on Lithic Technology and Human Behavior during Pleistocene in Zhejiang Province, Southeastern China

Paleolithic Archaeology in China

Continuous technological and behavioral development of late Pleistocene hominins in central South China: Multidisciplinary analysis at Sandinggai

Function and Behaviour: Use-Wear Evidence from Upper Paleolithic Tools in Southern Shanxi Province, North China

Lithic Technological Strategies of Late Pleistocene Hominins in the Daoshui River Valley, Hunan Province, Central South China

The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Central and East Asia: Blade Technology, Cultural Transmission, and Implications for Human Dispersals

Cultural adaptations to the Late Pleistocene: Regional variability of human behavior in southern Shanxi Province, central-northern China

A Discussion of How Blades Are Defined