Determination of Ultraviolet Stabilizers in Polyvinyl Chloride by Hplc with Resonance Raman Detection.

H KOIZUMI,MY DING,Y SUZUKI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/bunsekikagaku.40.5_245
1991-01-01
BUNSEKI KAGAKU
Abstract:Phenol-type ultraviolet (UV) stabilizers in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) were analyzed by resonance Raman detection HPLC. For selective and sensitive detection, UV stabilizers were derivatized with 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene-4'-sulfonyl chloride (DABSYL chloride). DABSYL derivatives have their absorption maximum at 460 nm and show resonance Raman effect when they are irradiated with a 488.0 nm line of an Ar ion laser. Analytical procedure for UV stabilizers in PVC products was as follows. UV stabilizers were separated from the PVC sample after dissolving in tetrahydrofuran. The polymer fraction was precipitated by adding methanol. After filtration, the solution was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was redissolved with 5 ml of acetonitrile, and then 1 ml of phenyl salicylate (Salol, internal standard) in acetonitrile was added to the solution. The solution was centrifuged to remove residual polymer. After evaporation of solvent, the residue was reacted with DABSYL chloride. A 10-mu-l portion of the reaction mixture was injected to HPLC. DABSYL derivatives of UV stabilizers were separated by using a Shiseido Capcell Pak(R) C18 column (4.6 i.d. X 250 mm) and acetonitrile/water (70/30) as an eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Chromatograms were obtained by monitoring the resonance Raman scattering at 1136 cm-1 from the flow cell which was irradiated vertically with a 488.0 nm line of Ar ion laser. The calibration curve based on the relative peak height of the UV stabilizer to phenyl salicylate was linear in the concentration range of 0.1 to 1.0 mg/ml for Tinuvin P (corresponding to contents of 0.04 w/w% to 0.4 w/w% in the PVC sample when 0.25 g of the samples were taken for the analysis). The content of Tinuvin P in a PVC product determined by this method was 0.234 +/- 0.010 w/w% (n = 5), which was in good agreement with the theoretical value of 0.24 w/w%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?