Abstract:Several independent cosmological data, collected within the last twenty years, revealed the accelerated expansion rate of the Universe, usually assumed to be driven by the so called dark energy, which, according to recent estimates, provides now about 70 % of the total amount of matter-energy in the Universe. The nature of dark energy is yet unknown. Several models of dark energy have been proposed: a non zero cosmological constant, a potential energy of some self interacting scalar field, effects related to the non homogeneous distribution of matter, or effects due to alternative theories of gravity. Recently, it turned out that the standard flat LambdaCDM is disfavored (at 4 sigma) when confronted with a high redshift Hubble diagram, consisting of supernovae of type Ia (SNIa), quasars (QSOs) and gamma ray-bursts (GRBs) ([1-3]). Here we use the same data to investigate if this tension is confirmed, using a different approach: actually in [1-3], the deviation between the best fit model and the LambdaCDM model was noticed by comparing cosmological parameters derived from cosmographic expansions of their theoretical predictions and observed high redshift Hubble diagram. In this paper we use a substantially different approach, based on a specific parametrization of the redshift dependent equation of state (EOS) of dark energy component w(z). Our statistical analysis is aimed to estimate the parameters characterizing the dark energy EOS: our results indicate (at > 3 sigma level) an evolving dark energy EOS, while the cosmological constant has a constant EOS, wLambda =-1. This result not only confirms the tension previously detected, but shows that it is not an artifact of cosmographic expansions.

Finding Possibility of Dynamical Dark Energy with Hubble Parameters

Can interacting dark energy with dynamical coupling resolve the Hubble tension

Probing Cosmic Background Dynamics with a Cosmological-model-independent Method

Investigating Dark Energy Equation of State With High Redshift Hubble Diagram

The Hubble parameter of the Local Distance Ladder from dynamical dark energy with no free parameters

Whether the late dark energy parameterization can reconcile the Hubble tension?

Solving the Hubble tension at intermediate redshifts with dynamical dark energy

Dynamical dark energy in light of cosmic distance measurements II: a study using current observations

The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy

On the interacting dark energy scenarios $-$ the case for Hubble constant tension

Exploring the expansion dynamics of the universe from galaxy cluster surveys

Measuring Dark Energy with Gamma-Ray Bursts and Other Cosmological Probes

Cosmological test of dark energy parameterizations in Hořava–Lifshitz gravity

Investigating The Hubble Tension Through Hubble Parameter Data

Is there a dynamical tendency in H0 with late time measurements?

Cosmological Test of Dark Energy Parametrizations in Horava-Lifshitz Gravity

Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially Flat ΛCDM Model, the Deceleration–Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature