Abstract:The discrepancy between the Hubble constant $H_0$ values derived from early-time and late-time measurements, reaching up to $4\sigma$, represents the most serious challenge in modern cosmology and astrophysics. In this work, we investigate if a similar tension exists between only late time measurements at different redshifts. We use the latest public datasets including Cosmic Chronometers, Megamasers, SNe Ia and DESI-BAO, that span from redshift $z \sim 0$ up to $z\sim 2.3$. By dividing the data into redshift bins, we derive $H_0$ values from each bin separately. Our analysis reveals a phenomenological dynamic evolution in $H_0$ across different redshift ranges, with a significance from $1.5\sigma$ and $2.3\sigma$, depending on the parameterization. Consistency of the model demands observational constancy of $H_0$ since it is an integration constant within the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric. Thus, these findings suggest that the observed Hubble tension might not only exist between early and late-time measurements but also among late-time data themselves, providing new insights into the nature of the Hubble tension.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper attempts to explore whether there is a similar tension in the late-time measurements of the Hubble constant \(H_0\) across different redshift ranges, akin to the tension between early and late-time measurements. Specifically, the authors investigate whether \(H_0\) exhibits a dynamic evolution trend when using only late-time measurement data across different redshift intervals.
### Background and Motivation
One of the main challenges in current cosmology is the significant discrepancy of more than 4σ between the measurements of the Hubble constant \(H_0\) in the early universe (through Cosmic Microwave Background, CMB, measurements) and the late universe (through the cosmic distance ladder measurements), known as the Hubble tension. This tension has sparked extensive discussion and research, proposing various possible explanations, including changes in the dark energy (DE) component, additional interactions between cosmic components, or modifications to gravitational theory.
### Research Methods
1. **Datasets**: The authors used the latest publicly available datasets, including Cosmic Chronometers, Megamasers, Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia), and DESI-BAO data, covering a redshift range from \(z \sim 0\) to \(z \sim 2.3\).
2. **Data Binning**: The data were divided into multiple bins according to redshift intervals, and the value of \(H_0\) was estimated separately within each bin.
3. **Parameterization Methods**: To quantify the dynamic evolution of \(H_0\), the authors adopted two parameterization methods:
- **Quadratic Parameterization**: Assuming \(H_0\) changes as a quadratic function of redshift.
- **Fourier Parameterization**: Assuming \(H_0\) changes as a Fourier series of redshift.
### Main Findings
1. **Dynamic Evolution**: The analysis results show that \(H_0\) exhibits significant dynamic evolution trends across different redshift intervals, with statistical significance ranging from 1.5σ to 2.3σ, depending on the parameterization method used.
2. **Hubble Tension**: These findings suggest that the Hubble tension not only exists between early and late-time measurements but may also be present within different redshift intervals of the late-time measurement data itself.
3. **Model Consistency**: According to the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, \(H_0\) should be a constant. Therefore, these findings of dynamic evolution pose new challenges to existing cosmological models.
### Conclusion
This study indicates that the Hubble tension may not be solely an issue between early and late-time measurements but also exists within the late-time measurement data itself. This discovery provides a new perspective for understanding the nature of the Hubble tension, suggesting that there may be some dynamic dark energy or other unknown factors affecting the measurement values of \(H_0\).