Abstract:The reliability of innovative textual information is important for investors to evaluate a firm's innovation status. TONE positivity of such information can reflect a firm's innovation capabilities; however, its authenticity may be compromised in the context of equity pledging. Therefore, this study addresses a critical gap by examining the relationship between equity-pledging behavior and the TONE positivity of innovative textual information among Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2022. Utilizing Python for text analysis and panel fixed-effect regression models, the study reveals that equity pledging is positively associated with TONE positivity. However, TONE positivity does not significantly relate to the firm's actual innovation capabilities but instead tends to increase when the firm's performance declines. These findings suggest that shareholders may strategically manipulate the TONE positivity to maintain control during equity pledging. Additionally, the study identifies mechanisms to enhance the reliability of TONE positivity, such as reducing external financing, mitigating internal agency problems, increasing the proportion of independent directors, and minimizing dual roles. The study's findings remain robust across various controls, including market sentiment, alternative proxies for innovation capabilities, industry factors, and shareholder ownership, as well as applying alternative methods like propensity score matching and difference-in-difference. These insights contribute to improving the quality of innovation-related textual information disclosure during equity pledging, enabling investors to make more informed assessments of a firm's innovation status for future investment.

What Happens when Firms Break Promises? the Case of Information Credibility

MARKET COMPETITION,MANAGER INCENTIVE,AND FRAUD BEHAVIOR OF LISTED COMPANIES——EVIDENCE FROM PUNISHMENT BULLETINS BY CSRC

Does the credibility of open market share repurchase matter?

Information transparency and corporate performance - Evidence from China's multi-tiered capital market system

The Credibility of Stock Repurchase Signals

Institutional Investors and Earnings Management Associated with Controlling Shareholders' Promises: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Is Innovation-Related Textual Information True? Insight from Equity Pledging Behavior in Chinese A-Share Listed Firms

Do Reputable Certifiers of Quality Exploit Their Reputations? Evidence from China’s IPO Market

Share pledging and earnings informativeness

The Post-issue Underperformance of Rights Issuers——Analysis Based on Information Asymmetry and Principal-Agent Theory

Re-Examination of the Effect of Ownership Structure on Financial Reporting: Evidence from Share Pledges in China

On the Moral Hazards,Information Revelation and Market Efficiency:Evidence from the Split-share Reform in China

Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Innovation Sustainability: Evidence from China

Does management tone matter in information disclosure? Evidence from IPO online roadshows in the SSE STAR market

Earnings Management, Underwriter Reputation, and Marketization: Evidence from IPO Market in China

Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications

Community social capital, managerial opportunistic behavior, and information uncertainty in IPO firms

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

Information assimilation and stock return synchronicity:Evidence from an investor relations management platform

Corporate Social Responsibility and Investor Relations Management: Evidence from China

Information disclosure as a means of minimizing asymmetric financial reporting: The role of market reaction